| 1 |
# Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation
|
| 2 |
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
|
| 3 |
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.4.6-r2.ebuild,v 1.5 2006/09/09 02:48:34 vapier Exp $
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
MAN_VER=""
|
| 6 |
PATCH_VER="1.2"
|
| 7 |
UCLIBC_VER="1.1"
|
| 8 |
UCLIBC_GCC_VER="3.4.5"
|
| 9 |
PIE_VER="8.7.9"
|
| 10 |
PIE_GCC_VER="3.4.6"
|
| 11 |
PP_VER="1.0"
|
| 12 |
PP_GCC_VER="3.4.6"
|
| 13 |
HTB_VER="1.00"
|
| 14 |
HTB_GCC_VER="3.4.4"
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
GCC_LIBSSP_SUPPORT="true"
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
ETYPE="gcc-compiler"
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
# arch/libc configurations known to be stable with {PIE,SSP}-by-default
|
| 21 |
SSP_STABLE="x86 sparc amd64 ppc ppc64"
|
| 22 |
SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE="arm mips ppc x86"
|
| 23 |
PIE_GLIBC_STABLE="x86 sparc amd64 ppc ppc64"
|
| 24 |
PIE_UCLIBC_STABLE="x86 mips ppc"
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
# arch/libc configurations known to be broken with {PIE,SSP}-by-default
|
| 27 |
SSP_UNSUPPORTED="hppa sh"
|
| 28 |
SSP_UCLIBC_UNSUPPORTED="${SSP_UNSUPPORTED}"
|
| 29 |
PIE_UCLIBC_UNSUPPORTED="alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k ppc64 s390 sh sparc"
|
| 30 |
PIE_GLIBC_UNSUPPORTED="hppa"
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
# whether we should split out specs files for multiple {PIE,SSP}-by-default
|
| 33 |
# and vanilla configurations.
|
| 34 |
SPLIT_SPECS=${SPLIT_SPECS-true}
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
#GENTOO_PATCH_EXCLUDE=""
|
| 37 |
#PIEPATCH_EXCLUDE=""
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
inherit toolchain eutils
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
DESCRIPTION="The GNU Compiler Collection. Includes C/C++, java compilers, pie+ssp extensions, Haj Ten Brugge runtime bounds checking"
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
KEYWORDS="-* ~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~ia64 ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sh ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-fbsd"
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
# we need a proper glibc version for the Scrt1.o provided to the pie-ssp specs
|
| 46 |
# NOTE: we SHOULD be using at least binutils 2.15.90.0.1 everywhere for proper
|
| 47 |
# .eh_frame ld optimisation and symbol visibility support, but it hasnt been
|
| 48 |
# well tested in gentoo on any arch other than amd64!!
|
| 49 |
RDEPEND="|| ( >=sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.12-r4 app-admin/eselect-compiler )
|
| 50 |
>=sys-libs/zlib-1.1.4
|
| 51 |
virtual/libiconv
|
| 52 |
elibc_glibc? (
|
| 53 |
>=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.3_pre20040420-r1
|
| 54 |
hardened? ( >=sys-libs/glibc-2.3.3_pre20040529 )
|
| 55 |
)
|
| 56 |
!build? (
|
| 57 |
gcj? (
|
| 58 |
gtk? (
|
| 59 |
|| ( ( x11-libs/libXt x11-libs/libX11 x11-libs/libXtst x11-proto/xproto x11-proto/xextproto ) virtual/x11 )
|
| 60 |
>=x11-libs/gtk+-2.2
|
| 61 |
)
|
| 62 |
>=media-libs/libart_lgpl-2.1
|
| 63 |
)
|
| 64 |
>=sys-libs/ncurses-5.2-r2
|
| 65 |
nls? ( sys-devel/gettext )
|
| 66 |
)"
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
if [[ ${CATEGORY/cross-} != ${CATEGORY} ]]; then
|
| 69 |
RDEPEND="${RDEPEND} ${CATEGORY}/binutils"
|
| 70 |
fi
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
|
| 73 |
>=sys-apps/texinfo-4.2-r4
|
| 74 |
>=sys-devel/bison-1.875
|
| 75 |
>=sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1
|
| 76 |
amd64? ( >=sys-devel/binutils-2.15.90.0.1.1-r1 )"
|
| 77 |
PDEPEND="|| ( sys-devel/gcc-config app-admin/eselect-compiler )"
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
src_unpack() {
|
| 80 |
gcc_src_unpack
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
# misc patches that havent made it into a patch tarball yet
|
| 83 |
[[ ${CHOST} == ${CTARGET} ]] && epatch "${FILESDIR}"/gcc-spec-env.patch
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
# nothing in the tree provides libssp.so, so nothing will ever trigger this
|
| 86 |
# logic, but having the patch in the tree makes life so much easier for me
|
| 87 |
# since I dont have to also have an overlay for this.
|
| 88 |
want_libssp && epatch "${FILESDIR}"/3.4.3/libssp.patch
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
# Anything useful and objc will require libffi. Seriously. Lets just force
|
| 91 |
# libffi to install with USE="objc", even though it normally only installs
|
| 92 |
# if you attempt to build gcj.
|
| 93 |
if ! use build && use objc && ! use gcj ; then
|
| 94 |
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/3.4.3/libffi-without-libgcj.patch
|
| 95 |
#epatch ${FILESDIR}/3.4.3/libffi-nogcj-lib-path-fix.patch
|
| 96 |
fi
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
# Fix cross-compiling
|
| 99 |
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/3.4.4/gcc-3.4.4-cross-compile.patch
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
[[ ${CTARGET} == *-softfloat-* ]] && epatch "${FILESDIR}"/3.4.4/gcc-3.4.4-softfloat.patch
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
# Arch stuff
|
| 104 |
case $(tc-arch) in
|
| 105 |
mips)
|
| 106 |
# If mips, and we DON'T want multilib, then rig gcc to only use n32 OR n64
|
| 107 |
if ! is_multilib; then
|
| 108 |
use n32 && epatch ${FILESDIR}/3.4.1/gcc-3.4.1-mips-n32only.patch
|
| 109 |
use n64 && epatch ${FILESDIR}/3.4.1/gcc-3.4.1-mips-n64only.patch
|
| 110 |
fi
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
# Patch forward-ported from a gcc-3.0.x patch that adds -march=r10000 and
|
| 113 |
# -mtune=r10000 support to gcc (Allows the compiler to generate code to
|
| 114 |
# take advantage of R10k's second ALU, perform shifts, etc..
|
| 115 |
#
|
| 116 |
# Needs re-porting to DFA in gcc-4.0 - Any Volunteers? :)
|
| 117 |
epatch ${FILESDIR}/3.4.2/gcc-3.4.x-mips-add-march-r10k.patch
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
# This is a very special patch -- it allows us to build semi-usable kernels
|
| 120 |
# on SGI IP28 (Indigo2 Impact R10000) systems. The patch is henceforth
|
| 121 |
# regarded as a kludge by upstream, and thus, it will never get accepted upstream,
|
| 122 |
# but for our purposes of building a kernel, it works.
|
| 123 |
# Unless you're building an IP28 kernel, you really don't need care about what
|
| 124 |
# this patch does, because if you are, you are probably already aware of what
|
| 125 |
# it does.
|
| 126 |
# All that said, the abilities of this patch are disabled by default and need
|
| 127 |
# to be enabled by passing -mip28-cache-barrier. Only used to build kernels,
|
| 128 |
# There is the possibility it may be used for very specific userland apps too.
|
| 129 |
if use ip28 or use ip32r10k; then
|
| 130 |
epatch ${FILESDIR}/3.4.2/gcc-3.4.2-mips-ip28_cache_barriers-v4.patch
|
| 131 |
fi
|
| 132 |
;;
|
| 133 |
amd64)
|
| 134 |
if is_multilib ; then
|
| 135 |
sed -i -e '/GLIBCXX_IS_NATIVE=/s:false:true:' libstdc++-v3/configure || die
|
| 136 |
fi
|
| 137 |
;;
|
| 138 |
esac
|
| 139 |
}
|