/[gentoo]/xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml
Gentoo

Contents of /xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 1.12 - (show annotations) (download) (as text)
Fri Feb 1 19:30:40 2008 UTC (6 years, 10 months ago) by jkt
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.11: +7 -7 lines
File MIME type: application/xml
#208475, Manifests aren't under files/ directory

Also addedd some markup around "files".

1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
2 <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd">
3 <!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml,v 1.11 2008/01/31 14:31:41 jkt Exp $ -->
4
5 <guide link="/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml">
6 <title>Gentoo Bug Reporting Guide</title>
7
8 <author title="Author">
9 <mail link="chriswhite@gentoo.org">Chris White</mail>
10 </author>
11 <author title="Editor">
12 <mail link="fox2mike@gentoo.org">Shyam Mani</mail>
13 </author>
14
15 <abstract>
16 This document shows the proper method of reporting bugs using Bugzilla.
17 </abstract>
18
19 <!-- The content of this document is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license -->
20 <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 -->
21 <license/>
22
23 <version>1.11</version>
24 <date>2008-01-31</date>
25
26 <chapter>
27 <title>Introduction</title>
28 <section>
29 <title>Preface</title>
30 <body>
31
32 <p>
33 One of the factors that delay a bug being fixed is the way it is reported. By
34 creating this guide, we hope to help improve the communication between
35 developers and users in bug resolution. Getting bugs fixed is an important, if
36 not crucial part of the quality assurance for any project and hopefully this
37 guide will help make that a success.
38 </p>
39
40 </body>
41 </section>
42 <section>
43 <title>Bugs!!!!</title>
44 <body>
45
46 <p>
47 You're emerge-ing a package or working with a program and suddenly the worst
48 happens -- you find a bug. Bugs come in many forms like emerge failures or
49 segmentation faults. Whatever the cause, the fact still remains that such a bug
50 must be fixed. Here is a few examples of such bugs.
51 </p>
52
53 <pre caption="A run time error">
54 $ <i>./bad_code `perl -e 'print Ax100'`</i>
55 Segmentation fault
56 </pre>
57
58 <pre caption="An emerge failure">
59 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.2/include/g++-v3/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2:
60 warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated
61 header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of
62 the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the &lt;X&gt; header for the &lt;X.h&gt;
63 header for C++ includes, or &lt;sstream&gt; instead of the deprecated header
64 &lt;strstream.h&gt;. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
65 In file included from main.cc:40:
66 menudef.h:55: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
67 OXPopupMenu*'
68 menudef.h:62: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
69 OXPopupMenu*'
70 menudef.h:70: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
71 OXPopupMenu*'
72 menudef.h:78: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
73 OXPopupMenu*'
74 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoOpen()':
75 main.cc:323: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
76 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoSave(char*)':
77 main.cc:337: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
78 make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
79 make[1]: Leaving directory
80 `/var/tmp/portage/xclass-0.7.4/work/xclass-0.7.4/example-app'
81 make: *** [shared] Error 2
82
83 !!! ERROR: x11-libs/xclass-0.7.4 failed.
84 !!! Function src_compile, Line 29, Exitcode 2
85 !!! 'emake shared' failed
86 </pre>
87
88 <p>
89 These errors can be quite troublesome. However, once you find them, what do you
90 do? The following sections will look at two important tools for handling run
91 time errors. After that, we'll take a look at compile errors, and how to handle
92 them. Let's start out with the first tool for debugging run time errors --
93 <c>gdb</c>.
94 </p>
95
96 </body>
97 </section>
98 </chapter>
99
100
101 <chapter>
102 <title>Debugging using GDB</title>
103 <section>
104 <title>Introduction</title>
105 <body>
106
107 <p>
108 GDB, or the (G)NU (D)e(B)ugger, is a program used to find run time errors that
109 normally involve memory corruption. First off, let's take a look at what
110 debugging entails. One of the main things you must do in order to debug a
111 program is to <c>emerge</c> the program with <c>FEATURES="nostrip"</c>. This
112 prevents the stripping of debug symbols. Why are programs stripped by default?
113 The reason is the same as that for having gzipped man pages -- saving space.
114 Here's how the size of a program varies with and without debug symbol stripping.
115 </p>
116
117 <pre caption="Filesize Comparison">
118 <comment>(debug symbols stripped)</comment>
119 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 3140 6/28 13:11 bad_code
120 <comment>(debug symbols intact)</comment>
121 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 6374 6/28 13:10 bad_code
122 </pre>
123
124 <p>
125 Just for reference, <e>bad_code</e> is the program we'll be debugging with
126 <c>gdb</c> later on. As you can see, the program without debugging symbols is
127 3140 bytes, while the program with them is 6374 bytes. That's close to double
128 the size! Two more things can be done for debugging. The first is adding ggdb3
129 to your CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS. This flag adds more debugging information than is
130 generally included. We'll see what that means later on. This is how
131 <path>/etc/make.conf</path> <e>might</e> look with the newly added flags.
132 </p>
133
134 <pre caption="make.conf settings">
135 CFLAGS="-O1 -pipe -g -ggdb"
136 CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
137 </pre>
138
139 <p>
140 Lastly, you can also add debug to the package's USE flags. This can be done
141 with the <path>package.use</path> file.
142 </p>
143
144 <pre caption="Using package.use to add debug USE flag">
145 # <i>echo "category/package debug" >> /etc/portage/package.use</i>
146 </pre>
147
148 <note>
149 The directory <path>/etc/portage</path> does not exist by default and you may
150 have to create it, if you have not already done so. If the package already has
151 USE flags set in <path>package.use</path>, you will need to manually modify them
152 in your favorite editor.
153 </note>
154
155 <p>
156 Then we re-emerge the package with the modifications we've done so far as shown
157 below.
158 </p>
159
160 <pre caption="Re-emergeing a package with debugging">
161 # <i>FEATURES="nostrip" emerge package</i>
162 </pre>
163
164 <p>
165 Now that debug symbols are setup, we can continue with debugging the program.
166 </p>
167
168 </body>
169 </section>
170 <section>
171 <title>Running the program with GDB</title>
172 <body>
173
174 <p>
175 Let's say we have a program here called "bad_code". Some person claims that the
176 program crashes and provides an example. You go ahead and test it out:
177 </p>
178
179 <pre caption="Breaking The Program">
180 $ <i>./bad_code `perl -e 'print Ax100'`</i>
181 Segmentation fault
182 </pre>
183
184 <p>
185 It seems this person was right. Since the program is obviously broken, we have
186 a bug at hand. Now, it's time to use <c>gdb</c> to help solve this matter. First
187 we run <c>gdb</c> with <c>--args</c>, then give it the full program with
188 arguments like shown:
189 </p>
190
191 <pre caption="Running Our Program Through GDB">
192 $ <i>gdb --args ./bad_code `perl -e 'print Ax100'`</i>
193 GNU gdb 6.3
194 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
195 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
196 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
197 Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
198 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
199 This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
200 </pre>
201
202 <note>
203 One can also debug with core dumps. These core files contain the same
204 information that the program would produce when run with gdb. In order to debug
205 with a core file with bad_code, you would run <c>gdb ./bad_code core</c> where
206 core is the name of the core file.
207 </note>
208
209 <p>
210 You should see a prompt that says "(gdb)" and waits for input. First, we have to
211 run the program. We type in <c>run</c> at the command and receive a notice like:
212 </p>
213
214 <pre caption="Running the program in GDB">
215 (gdb) <i>run</i>
216 Starting program: /home/chris/bad_code
217
218 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
219 0xb7ec6dc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
220 </pre>
221
222 <p>
223 Here we see the program starting, as well as a notification of SIGSEGV, or
224 Segmentation Fault. This is GDB telling us that our program has crashed. It
225 also gives the last run function it could trace when the program crashes.
226 However, this isn't too useful, as there could be multiple strcpy's in the
227 program, making it hard for developers to find which one is causing the issue.
228 In order to help them out, we do what's called a backtrace. A backtrace runs
229 backwards through all the functions that occurred upon program execution, to the
230 function at fault. Functions that return (without causing a crash) will not show
231 up on the backtrace. To get a backtrace, at the (gdb) prompt, type in <c>bt</c>.
232 You will get something like this:
233 </p>
234
235 <pre caption="Program backtrace">
236 (gdb) <i>bt</i>
237 #0 0xb7ec6dc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
238 #1 0x0804838c in run_it ()
239 #2 0x080483ba in main ()
240 </pre>
241
242 <p>
243 You can notice the trace pattern clearly. main() is called first, followed by
244 run_it(), and somewhere in run_it() lies the strcpy() at fault. Things such as
245 this help developers narrow down problems. There are a few exceptions to the
246 output. First off is forgetting to enable debug symbols with
247 <c>FEATURES="nostrip"</c>. With debug symbols stripped, the output looks something
248 like this:
249 </p>
250
251 <pre caption="Program backtrace With debug symbols stripped">
252 (gdb) <i>bt</i>
253 #0 0xb7e2cdc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
254 #1 0x0804838c in ?? ()
255 #2 0xbfd19510 in ?? ()
256 #3 0x00000000 in ?? ()
257 #4 0x00000000 in ?? ()
258 #5 0xb7eef148 in libgcc_s_personality () from /lib/libc.so.6
259 #6 0x080482ed in ?? ()
260 #7 0x080495b0 in ?? ()
261 #8 0xbfd19528 in ?? ()
262 #9 0xb7dd73b8 in __guard_setup () from /lib/libc.so.6
263 #10 0xb7dd742d in __guard_setup () from /lib/libc.so.6
264 #11 0x00000006 in ?? ()
265 #12 0xbfd19548 in ?? ()
266 #13 0x080483ba in ?? ()
267 #14 0x00000000 in ?? ()
268 #15 0x00000000 in ?? ()
269 #16 0xb7deebcc in __new_exitfn () from /lib/libc.so.6
270 #17 0x00000000 in ?? ()
271 #18 0xbfd19560 in ?? ()
272 #19 0xb7ef017c in nullserv () from /lib/libc.so.6
273 #20 0xb7dd6f37 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
274 #21 0x00000001 in ?? ()
275 #22 0xbfd195d4 in ?? ()
276 #23 0xbfd195dc in ?? ()
277 #24 0x08048201 in ?? ()
278 </pre>
279
280 <p>
281 This backtrace contains a large number of ?? marks. This is because without
282 debug symbols, <c>gdb</c> doesn't know how the program was run. Hence, it is
283 crucial that debug symbols are <e>not</e> stripped. Now remember a while ago we
284 mentioned the -ggdb flag. Let's see what the output looks like with the flag
285 enabled:
286 </p>
287
288 <pre caption="Program backtrace with -ggdb3">
289 (gdb) <i>bt</i>
290 #0 0xb7e4bdc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
291 #1 0x0804838c in run_it (input=0x0) at bad_code.c:7
292 #2 0x080483ba in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfd3a434) at bad_code.c:12
293 </pre>
294
295 <p>
296 Here we see that a lot more information is available for developers. Not only is
297 function information displayed, but even the exact line numbers of the source
298 files. This method is the most preferred if you can spare the extra space.
299 Here's how much the file size varies between debug, strip, and -ggdb enabled
300 programs.
301 </p>
302
303 <pre caption="Filesize differences With -ggdb flag">
304 <comment>(debug symbols stripped)</comment>
305 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 3140 6/28 13:11 bad_code
306 <comment>(debug symbols enabled)</comment>
307 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 6374 6/28 13:10 bad_code
308 <comment>(-ggdb flag enabled)</comment>
309 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 19552 6/28 13:11 bad_code
310 </pre>
311
312 <p>
313 As you can see, -ggdb adds about <e>13178</e> more bytes to the file size over
314 the one with debugging symbols. However, as shown above, this increase in file
315 size can be worth it if presenting debug information to developers. The
316 backtrace can be saved to a file by copying and pasting from the terminal (if
317 it's a non-x based terminal, you can use gpm. To keep this doc simple, I
318 recommend you read up on the <uri link="/doc/en/gpm.xml#doc_chap4">documentation
319 for gpm</uri> to see how to copy and paste with it). Now that we're done with
320 <c>gdb</c>, we can quit.
321 </p>
322
323 <pre caption="Quitting GDB">
324 (gdb) <i>quit</i>
325 The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) <i>y</i>
326 $
327 </pre>
328
329 <p>
330 This ends the walk-through of <c>gdb</c>. Using <c>gdb</c>, we hope that you will
331 be able to use it to create better bug reports. However, there are other types
332 of errors that can cause a program to fail during run time. One of the other
333 ways is through improper file access. We can find those using a nifty little
334 tool called <c>strace</c>.
335 </p>
336
337 </body>
338 </section>
339 </chapter>
340
341 <chapter>
342 <title>Finding file access errors using strace</title>
343 <section>
344 <title>Introduction</title>
345 <body>
346
347 <p>
348 Programs often use files to fetch configuration information, access hardware or
349 write logs. Sometimes, a program attempts to reach such files incorrectly. A
350 tool called <c>strace</c> was created to help deal with this. <c>strace</c>
351 traces system calls (hence the name) which include calls that use the memory and
352 files. For our example, we're going to take a program foobar2. This is an
353 updated version of foobar. However, during the change over to foobar2, you notice
354 all your configurations are missing! In foobar version 1, you had it setup to
355 say "foo", but now it's using the default "bar".
356 </p>
357
358 <pre caption="Foobar2 With an invalid configuration">
359 $ <i>./foobar2</i>
360 Configuration says: bar
361 </pre>
362
363 <p>
364 Our previous configuration specifically had it set to foo, so let's use
365 <c>strace</c> to find out what's going on.
366 </p>
367
368 </body>
369 </section>
370 <section>
371 <title>Using strace to track the issue</title>
372 <body>
373
374 <p>
375 We make <c>strace</c> log the results of the system calls. To do this, we run
376 <c>strace</c> with the -o[file] arguments. Let's use it on foobar2 as shown.
377 </p>
378
379 <pre caption="Running foobar2 through strace">
380 # <i>strace -ostrace.log ./foobar2</i>
381 </pre>
382
383 <p>
384 This creates a file called <path>strace.log</path> in the current directory. We
385 check the file, and shown below are the relevant parts from the file.
386 </p>
387
388 <pre caption="A Look At the strace Log">
389 open(".foobar2/config", O_RDONLY) = 3
390 read(3, "bar", 3) = 3
391 </pre>
392
393 <p>
394 Aha! So There's the problem. Someone moved the configuration directory to
395 <path>.foobar2</path> instead of <path>.foobar</path>. We also see the program
396 reading in "bar" as it should. In this case, we can recommend the ebuild
397 maintainer to put a warning about it. For now though, we can copy over the
398 config file from <path>.foobar</path> and modify it to produce the correct
399 results.
400 </p>
401
402 </body>
403 </section>
404 <section>
405 <title>Conclusion</title>
406 <body>
407
408 <p>
409 Now we've taken care of finding run time bugs. These bugs prove to be
410 problematic when you try and run your programs. However, run time errors are
411 the least of your concerns if your program won't compile at all. Let's take a
412 look at how to address <c>emerge</c> compile errors.
413 </p>
414
415 </body>
416 </section>
417 </chapter>
418
419 <chapter>
420 <title>Handling emerge Errors</title>
421 <section>
422 <title>Introduction</title>
423 <body>
424
425 <p>
426 <c>emerge</c> errors, such as the one displayed earlier, can be a major cause
427 of frustration for users. Reporting them is considered crucial for maintaining
428 the health of Gentoo. Let's take a look at a sample ebuild, foobar2, which
429 contains some build errors.
430 </p>
431
432 </body>
433 </section>
434 <section id="emerge_error">
435 <title>Evaluating emerge Errors</title>
436 <body>
437
438 <p>
439 Let's take a look at this very simple <c>emerge</c> error:
440 </p>
441
442 <pre caption="emerge Error">
443 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-7.o foobar2-7.c
444 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-8.o foobar2-8.c
445 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-9.o foobar2-9.c
446 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2.o foobar2.c
447 foobar2.c:1:17: ogg.h: No such file or directory
448 make: *** [foobar2.o] Error 1
449
450 !!! ERROR: sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 failed.
451 !!! Function src_compile, Line 19, Exitcode 2
452 !!! Make failed!
453 !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message
454 </pre>
455
456 <p>
457 The program is compiling smoothly when it suddenly stops and presents an error message. This
458 particular error can be split into 3 different sections, The compile messages, the build
459 error, and the emerge error message as shown below.
460 </p>
461
462 <pre caption="Parts of the error">
463 <comment>(Compilation Messages)</comment>
464 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-7.o foobar2-7.c
465 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-8.o foobar2-8.c
466 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-9.o foobar2-9.c
467 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2.o foobar2.c
468
469 <comment>(Build Error)</comment>
470 foobar2.c:1:17: ogg.h: No such file or directory
471 make: *** [foobar2.o] Error 1
472
473 <comment>(emerge Error)</comment>
474 !!! ERROR: sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 failed.
475 !!! Function src_compile, Line 19, Exitcode 2
476 !!! Make failed!
477 !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message
478 </pre>
479
480 <p>
481 The compilation messages are what lead up to the error. Most often, it's good to
482 at least include 10 lines of compile information so that the developer knows
483 where the compilation was at when the error occurred.
484 </p>
485
486 <p>
487 Make errors are the actual error and the information the developer needs. When
488 you see "make: ***", this is often where the error has occurred. Normally, you
489 can copy and paste 10 lines above it and the developer will be able to address
490 the issue. However, this may not always work and we'll take a look at an
491 alternative shortly.
492 </p>
493
494 <p>
495 The emerge error is what <c>emerge</c> throws out as an error. Sometimes, this
496 might also contain some important information. Often people make the mistake of
497 posting the emerge error and that's all. This is useless by itself, but with
498 make error and compile information, a developer can get what application and
499 what version of the package is failing. As a side note, make is commonly used as
500 the build process for programs (<b>but not always</b>). If you can't find a
501 "make: ***" error anywhere, then simply copy and paste 20 lines before the
502 emerge error. This should take care of most all build system error messages. Now
503 let's say the errors seem to be quite large. 10 lines won't be enough to catch
504 everything. That's where PORT_LOGDIR comes into play.
505 </p>
506
507 </body>
508 </section>
509 <section>
510 <title>emerge and PORT_LOGDIR</title>
511 <body>
512
513 <p>
514 PORT_LOGDIR is a portage variable that sets up a log directory for separate
515 emerge logs. Let's take a look and see what that entails. First, run your
516 emerge with PORT_LOGDIR set to your favorite log location. Let's say we have a
517 location <path>/var/log/portage</path>. We'll use that for our log directory:
518 </p>
519
520 <note>
521 In the default setup, <path>/var/log/portage</path> does not exist, and you will
522 most likely have to create it. If you do not, portage will fail to write the
523 logs.
524 </note>
525
526 <pre caption="emerge-ing With PORT_LOGDIR">
527 # <i>PORT_LOGDIR=/var/log/portage emerge foobar2</i>
528 </pre>
529
530 <p>
531 Now the emerge fails again. However, this time we have a log we can work with,
532 and attach to the bug later on. Let's take a quick look at our log directory.
533 </p>
534
535 <pre caption="PORT_LOGDIR Contents">
536 # <i>ls -la /var/log/portage</i>
537 total 16
538 drwxrws--- 2 root root 4096 Jun 30 10:08 .
539 drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 4096 Jun 30 10:08 ..
540 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7390 Jun 30 10:09 2115-foobar2-1.0.log
541 </pre>
542
543 <p>
544 The log files have the format [counter]-[package name]-[version].log. Counter
545 is a special variable that is meant to state this package as the n-th package
546 you've emerged. This prevents duplicate logs from appearing. A quick look at
547 the log file will show the entire emerge process. This can be attached later
548 on as we'll see in the bug reporting section. Now that we've safely obtained
549 our information needed to report the bug we can continue to do so. However,
550 before we get started on that, we need to make sure no one else has reported
551 the issue. Let's take a look at searching for bugs.
552 </p>
553
554 </body>
555 </section>
556 </chapter>
557
558 <chapter>
559 <title>Searching Using Bugzilla</title>
560 <section>
561 <title>Introduction</title>
562 <body>
563
564 <p>
565 <uri link="http://www.bugzilla.org">Bugzilla</uri> is what we at Gentoo use to
566 handle bugs. Gentoo's Bugzilla is reachable by HTTPS and HTTP. HTTPS is
567 available for those on insecure networks or simply paranoid :). For the sake of
568 consistency, we will be using the HTTPS version in the examples to follow. Head
569 over to <uri link="https://bugs.gentoo.org">Gentoo Bugs</uri> to see how it
570 looks.
571 </p>
572
573 <p>
574 One of the most frustrating things for developers and bug-wranglers is finding
575 duplicate bug reports. These cost them valuable time that they could otherwise
576 use to work on more important bugs. Often, this can be prevented by a few simple
577 search methods. So we're going to see how to search for bugs and find out if
578 you have one that's similar. For this example, we're going to use the xclass
579 emerge error that was used earlier.
580 </p>
581
582 <pre caption="xclass emerge error">
583 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.2/include/g++-v3/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2:
584 warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated
585 header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of
586 the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the &lt;X&gt; header for the &lt;X.h&gt;
587 header for C++ includes, or &lt;sstream&gt; instead of the deprecated header
588 &lt;strstream.h&gt;. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
589 In file included from main.cc:40:
590 menudef.h:55: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
591 OXPopupMenu*'
592 menudef.h:62: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
593 OXPopupMenu*'
594 menudef.h:70: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
595 OXPopupMenu*'
596 menudef.h:78: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
597 OXPopupMenu*'
598 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoOpen()':
599 main.cc:323: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
600 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoSave(char*)':
601 main.cc:337: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
602 make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
603 make[1]: Leaving directory
604 `/var/tmp/portage/xclass-0.7.4/work/xclass-0.7.4/example-app'
605 make: *** [shared] Error 2
606
607 !!! ERROR: x11-libs/xclass-0.7.4 failed.
608 !!! Function src_compile, Line 29, Exitcode 2
609 !!! 'emake shared' failed
610 </pre>
611
612 <p>
613 So to begin searching, we head over to the <uri
614 link="https://bugs.gentoo.org/">Bugzilla Homepage</uri>.
615 </p>
616
617 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-homepage.png" caption="Bugzilla Homepage"/>
618
619 <p>
620 We'll click on "Query Existing bug reports". The reason why we choose this
621 over the basic bug search is because the basic bug search tends to give vague
622 results and often hinders users from looking through the results and finding the
623 duplicate bug. Once we click on the query screen, we reach the next page:
624 </p>
625
626 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-search.png" caption="Bugzilla Search Page"/>
627
628 <note>
629 If you've used the Advanced Search before, you'll most likely see that screen
630 instead.
631 </note>
632
633 <p>
634 Proceed by clicking on the "Advanced Search" link to bring up the Advanced
635 Search page.
636 </p>
637
638 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-adv-search.png" caption="Advanced Search Page"/>
639
640 <p>
641 This is how the Advanced Search Page looks like. While it may seem overwhelming
642 at first, we're going to look at a few simple areas to narrow down the rather
643 vague searches bugzilla returns.
644 </p>
645
646 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-content.png" caption="Content"/>
647
648 <p>
649 The first field is the summary of the bug. Here we're simply going to put the
650 name of the package that's crashing. If bugzie doesn't return results, try
651 removing the package name, just in case someone didn't put that in the summary
652 (highly unlikely, but we've seen a fair share of strange bug reports).
653 </p>
654
655 <p>
656 Product, Component, and Version should all be set to the default. This
657 prevents us from being too specific and missing all the bugs.
658 </p>
659
660 <p>
661 Comment is the important part. Use the comment field to list what appears to be a
662 specific instance of the error. Basically, don't use anything like the
663 beginning of the build error, find a line that's before it stating a true
664 error. Also, you'll want to filter out any punctuation to prevent bugzilla
665 from interpreting the results the comment the wrong way. Example from the xclass
666 emerge error:
667 </p>
668
669 <pre caption="Comment Line Content">
670 menudef.h:78: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `OXPopupMenu'
671 <comment>(Remove the quotes ' ')</comment>
672 menudef.h 78 error brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize OXPopupMenu
673 </pre>
674
675 <p>
676 The above is specific enough to where we'll find the bug without wading through
677 other xclass compile failure candidates.
678 </p>
679
680 <p>
681 URI, Whiteboard, and Keywords can all be left alone. What we've entered so far
682 should be enough to find our bug. Let's take a look at what we have filled out.
683 </p>
684
685 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-comp-search.png" caption="Completed Search Form"/>
686
687 <p>
688 Now we click on the Search button and here come the results...
689 </p>
690
691 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-search-result.png" caption="Search Results"/>
692
693 <p>
694 Only 2 bugs! That's a lot easier to deal with. We click on the first one to
695 check, and sure enough it's the one we're looking for.
696 </p>
697
698 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-located.png" caption="Bug Located"/>
699
700 <p>
701 Not only is it the one we want, but it has also been resolved. By checking the
702 last comment we see the solution and know what to do in order to resolve it.
703 Now, let's see what would have happened if we had not used the advanced search.
704 </p>
705
706 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-basic-search-result.png" caption="Basic Search Results"/>
707
708 <p>
709 4 more bugs to deal with! It gets even worse with larger packages. However,
710 with these simple tools, we're able to significantly narrow down the search to
711 try and locate a specific bug.
712 </p>
713
714 </body>
715 </section>
716 <section>
717 <title>Conclusion</title>
718 <body>
719
720 <p>
721 Let's say that you have searched and searched but still can't find a bug.
722 You've found yourself a new bug. Let's take a look at the bug reporting process
723 for submitting your new bug.
724 </p>
725
726 </body>
727 </section>
728 </chapter>
729
730 <chapter>
731 <title>Reporting Bugs</title>
732 <section>
733 <title>Introduction</title>
734 <body>
735
736 <p>
737 In this chapter, we'll figure out how to use Bugzilla to file a shiny, new bug.
738 Head over to <uri link="https://bugs.gentoo.org">Gentoo Bugs</uri> and...
739 </p>
740
741 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-homepage.png" caption="Bugzilla Homepage"/>
742
743 <p>
744 Click on "Report a Bug - Using the guided format".
745 </p>
746
747 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-prod-select.png" caption="Product Selection"/>
748
749 <p>
750 As you can see, <b>major</b> emphasis has been placed on putting your bug in the
751 right place. Gentoo Linux is where a large majority of bugs go.
752 </p>
753
754 <p>
755 Despite this, some people will file ebuild bugs in portage development
756 (assumption that portage team handles the portage tree) or infra (assumption
757 that infra has access to mirrors and rsync and can fix it directly). This is
758 simply not how things work.
759 </p>
760
761 <p>
762 Another common misconception occurs with our Documentation bugs. For example, a
763 user finds a bug with the <uri link="/proj/en/releng/catalyst/">Catalyst
764 Docs</uri>. The general tendency is to file a bug under Docs-user, which gets
765 assigned to the <uri link="http://gdp.gentoo.org">GDP</uri>, when it should
766 actually go to a member of the <uri link="/proj/en/releng/">Release
767 Engineering</uri> team. As a rule of thumb, only documentation under
768 <path>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/*</path> is under the GDP. Anything under
769 <path>http://www.gentoo.org/proj/*</path> is under the respective teams.
770 </p>
771
772 <note>
773 We would rather see a bug whose product was not supposed to be Gentoo Linux but
774 has been filed under the same rather than seeing a bug which belongs the Gentoo
775 Linux product and filed elsewhere. While neither is preferred, the former is more
776 acceptable and understandable (except website bugs.. we might have an issue with
777 that...).
778 </note>
779
780 <p>
781 Our bug goes in Gentoo Linux as it's an ebuild bug. We head over there and are
782 presented with the multi-step bug reporting process. Let us now proceed with
783 Step 1...
784 </p>
785
786 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-guide-step1.png" caption="Guided Format Step 1"/>
787
788 <p>
789 The first step here is really important (as the red text tells you). This is
790 where you search to see that someone else hasn't hit the same bug you have, yet.
791 If you do skip this step and a bug like yours already exists, it will be marked
792 as a DUPLICATE thus wasting a large amount of QA effort. To give you an idea,
793 the bug numbers that are struck out above are duplicate bugs. Now comes step 2,
794 where we give the information.
795 </p>
796
797 </body>
798 </section>
799 <section>
800 <title>Required Information</title>
801 <body>
802
803 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-basic.png" caption="Basic Information"/>
804
805 <p>
806 Let us take a closer look at what's what.
807 </p>
808
809 <ul>
810 <li>
811 First, there's the Product. The product will narrow down the bug to a
812 specific area of Gentoo like Bugzilla (for bugs relating to
813 bugs.gentoo.org), Docs-user(for User Documentation) or Gentoo Linux (for
814 ebuilds and the like).
815 </li>
816 <li>
817 Component is where exactly the problem occurs, more specifically which part
818 of selected product the bug comes under. This makes classification easier.
819 </li>
820 <li>
821 Hardware platform is what architecture you're running. If you were running
822 SPARC, you would set it to SPARC.
823 </li>
824 <li>
825 Operating System is what Operating System you're using. Because Gentoo is
826 considered a "Meta-distribution", it can run on other operating systems
827 beside Linux.
828 </li>
829 </ul>
830
831 <p>
832 So, for our example bug, we have :
833 </p>
834
835 <ul>
836 <li>Product - Gentoo Linux (Since it is an ebuild issue)</li>
837 <li>Component - Application (It is an application at fault, foobar2)</li>
838 <li>Hardware Platform - All (This error could occur across architectures)</li>
839 <li>Operation System - All (It could occur on all types of systems)</li>
840 </ul>
841
842 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-basic-comp.png" caption="Completed Basic Information"/>
843
844 <ul>
845 <li>
846 Build Identifier is basically the User Agent of the browser that is being
847 used to report the bugs (for logging purposes). You can just leave this as
848 is.
849 </li>
850 <li>
851 URL is optional and is used to point to relevant information on another site
852 (upstream bugzilla, release notes on package homepage etc.). You should
853 never use URL to point to pastebins for error messages, logs, <c>emerge
854 --info</c> output, screenshots or similar information. Instead, these should
855 always be attached to the bug.
856 </li>
857 <li>
858 In the Summary, you should put the package category, name, and number.
859 </li>
860 </ul>
861
862 <p>
863 Not including the category in the summary really isn't too bad, but it's
864 recommended. If you don't include the package name, however, we won't know what
865 you're filling a bug for, and will have to ask you about it later. The version
866 number is important for people searching for bugs. If 20 people filed bugs and
867 not one put a version number, how would people looking for similar bugs be able
868 to tell if one was there's? They'd have to look through every single bug, which
869 isn't too hard, but if there are say, 200 bugs.. it's not that easy. After all
870 the package information, you'll want to include a small description of the
871 incident. Here's an example:
872 </p>
873
874 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-summary.png" caption="Summary"/>
875
876 <p>
877 These simple rules can make handling bugs a lot easier. Next are the details.
878 Here we put in the information about the bug. We'll demonstrate with an example:
879 </p>
880
881 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-details.png" caption="Details"/>
882
883 <p>
884 Now the developer knows why we're filing the bug. They can then try to
885 reproduce it. Reproducibility tells us how often we were able to make the
886 problem recur. In this example, we can reproduce it any time simply by running
887 foobar2. Let's put that information in.
888 </p>
889
890 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-reprod.png" caption="Reproduction"/>
891
892 <p>
893 We have explained how we found the bug. The next step is to explain what were
894 the results we got and what we think they should actually be.
895 </p>
896
897 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-results.png" caption="Results"/>
898
899 <p>
900 We could then provide additional information. This could be things such as
901 stack traces, <b>sections</b> (since the whole log is usually big and of not
902 much use) of strace logs, but most importantly, your <c>emerge --info</c>
903 output. Here's an example.
904 </p>
905
906 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-addl-info.png" caption="Additional Information"/>
907
908 <p>
909 Lastly we select the severity of the bug. Please look this over carefully. In
910 most cases it's OK to leave it as is and someone will raise/lower it for you.
911 However, if you raise the severity of the bug, please make sure you read it over
912 carefully and make sure you're not making a mistake. A run down of the various
913 levels is given below.
914 </p>
915
916 <ul>
917 <li>
918 Blocker - The program just plain doesn't want to emerge or is a major
919 hinderance to the system. For example a <c>baselayout</c> issue which
920 prevents a system from booting up would be a sure candidate to be labelled
921 blocker.
922 </li>
923 <li>
924 Critical - The program has loss of data or severe memory leaks during
925 runtime. Again, an important program like say <c>net-tools</c> failing to
926 compile could be labelled critical. It won't prevent the system from
927 starting up, but is quite essential for day to day stuff.
928 </li>
929 <li>
930 Major - The program crashes, but nothing that causes your system severe
931 damage or information loss.
932 </li>
933 <li>
934 Minor - Your program crashes here and there with apparent workarounds.
935 </li>
936 <li>
937 Normal - The default. If you're not sure leave it here unless it's a new
938 build or cosmetic change, then read below for more information.
939 </li>
940 <li>Trivial - Things such as a mispelled word or whitespace clean up. </li>
941 <li>
942 Enhancement - A request to enable a new feature in a program, or more
943 specifically <e>new ebuilds</e>.
944 </li>
945 </ul>
946
947 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-sev.png" caption="Severity"/>
948
949 <p>
950 Here, we'll set it to Normal.
951 </p>
952
953 <p>
954 Now we can submit the bug report by clicking on the Submit Bug Report box. You
955 will now see your new bug come up. See <uri
956 link="https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97265">Bug 97561</uri> for what
957 the result looks like. We've reported our bug! Now let's see how it's dealt
958 with.
959 </p>
960
961 </body>
962 </section>
963 <section>
964 <title>Zero-day bump requests</title>
965 <body>
966
967 <p>
968 So far, we've shown what to do when filing a bug. Now let's take a look at what
969 <e>not</e> to do.
970 </p>
971
972 <p>
973 Suppose that you've eagerly been following an upstream project's schedule, and
974 when you check their homepage, guess what? They just released a new version a
975 few minutes ago! Most users would immediately rush over to Gentoo's bugzilla to
976 report the new version is available; please bump the existing version and add
977 it to Portage, etc. However, this is exactly what you should <b>not</b> do.
978 These kinds of requests are called zero-day (or 0-day) bump requests, as they're
979 made the same day that a new version is released.
980 </p>
981
982 <impo>
983 <b>Please wait <e>at least</e> 48 hours before reporting a new release on our
984 bugzilla.</b> Also, you <e>must</e> check bugzilla before posting your request
985 to make sure that someone else hasn't already reported it, or that the Gentoo
986 maintainers haven't already dealt with the new version.
987 </impo>
988
989 <p>
990 Why should you wait? First, it's quite rude to demand that Gentoo developers
991 drop everything they're doing just to add a new release that came out 15 minutes
992 ago. Your zero-day bump request could be marked as INVALID or LATER, as
993 developers have plenty of pressing issues to keep them busy. Second, developers
994 are usually aware of pending new releases well in advance of users, as they must
995 follow upstream quite closely. They already know a new version is on its way.
996 In many cases, they will have already opened a bug, or might even already added
997 it in Portage as a masked package.
998 </p>
999
1000 <p>
1001 Be smart when testing and requesting new versions of packages. Search bugzilla
1002 before posting your bump request -- is there already a bug open? Have you synced
1003 lately; is it already in Portage? Has it actually been released by upstream?
1004 Basic common sense will go a long way, and will endear you to developers that
1005 already have a lot to do. If it's been several days since release and you're
1006 sure that there are no open requests for it (and that it's not in Portage), then
1007 you can open up a new bug. Be sure to mention that it compiles and runs well on
1008 your arch. Any other helpful information you provide is most welcome.
1009 </p>
1010
1011 <p>
1012 Want to see the newest version of your favorite package in Portage? File smart
1013 bugs.
1014 </p>
1015
1016 </body>
1017 </section>
1018 </chapter>
1019
1020 <chapter>
1021 <title>Working With Your Bug</title>
1022 <section>
1023 <body>
1024
1025 <p>
1026 Looking at the bug, we see the information we provided earlier. You will notice
1027 that the bug has been assigned to bug-wranglers@gentoo.org. This is the default
1028 location for Application component bugs.
1029 </p>
1030
1031 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-basic.png" caption="New Bug Basic Information"/>
1032
1033 <p>
1034 The details we entered about the bug are available as well.
1035 </p>
1036
1037 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-details.png" caption="New Bug Details"/>
1038
1039 <p>
1040 However, bug-wranglers (usually) won't fix our bugs, so we'll reassign it to
1041 someone that can (you can let bug-wranglers re-assign it for you as well). For
1042 this we use the package's metadata.xml. You can normally find them in
1043 <path>/usr/portage/category/package/metadata.xml</path>. Here's one I've made up
1044 for foobar2.
1045 </p>
1046
1047 <note>
1048 You have to be the reporter of the bug or a member of certain Gentoo Bugzilla
1049 groups (like Gentoo Developers) to be able to reassign bugs.
1050 </note>
1051
1052 <pre caption="metadata.xml">
1053 &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
1054 &lt;!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd"&gt;
1055 &lt;pkgmetadata&gt;
1056 &lt;herd&gt;chriswhite&lt;/herd&gt;
1057 &lt;maintainer&gt;
1058 &lt;email&gt;chriswhite@gentoo.org&lt;/email&gt;
1059 &lt;name&gt;Chris White&lt;/name&gt;
1060 &lt;/maintainer&gt;
1061 &lt;longdescription lang="en"&gt;
1062 Foobar2 is a package that uses a configuration file to display a word.
1063 &lt;/longdescription&gt;
1064 &lt;/pkgmetadata&gt;
1065 </pre>
1066
1067 <p>
1068 Notice the maintainer section. This lists the maintainer of the package, which
1069 in this case is myself, Chris White. The email listed is chriswhite@gentoo.org.
1070 We will use this to re-assign the bug to the proper person. To do this, click
1071 the bubble next to Reassign bug to, then fill in the email.
1072 </p>
1073
1074 <note>
1075 A bug for a package without a metadata.xml file should be re-assigned to
1076 maintainer-needed@gentoo.org and a package that needs a Gentoo Developer to
1077 maintain should be assigned to maintainer-wanted@gentoo.org.
1078 </note>
1079
1080 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-reassign.png" caption="Bug Reassignment"/>
1081
1082 <p>
1083 Then hit the Commit button for the changes to take place. The bug has been
1084 reassigned to me. Shortly afterward, you notice (by email usually) that I've
1085 responded to your bug. I've stated that I'd like to see an strace log to figure
1086 out how the program is trying to reach your configuration file. You follow the
1087 previous instructions on using strace and obtain an strace log. Now you need to
1088 attach it to the bug. In order to do this, click on "Create A New Attachment".
1089 </p>
1090
1091 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-attach.png" caption="New Attachment"/>
1092
1093 <p>
1094 Now we have to attach the log. Let's go throught it step wise.
1095 </p>
1096
1097 <ul>
1098 <li>
1099 File - This is the location of the file in your machine. In this example,
1100 the location of <path>strace.log</path>. You can use the "Browse..." button
1101 to select the file, or enter the path directly in the text field.
1102 </li>
1103 <li>
1104 Description - A short one liner, or a few wors describing the attachment.
1105 We'll just enter strace.log here, since that's quite self-explanatory.
1106 </li>
1107 <li>
1108 Content Type - This is the type of the file we're attaching to the bug.
1109 </li>
1110 <li>
1111 Obsoletes - If there were attachements submitted to the bug before the
1112 current one, you have an option of declaring them obsoleted by yours. Since
1113 we have no prior attachments to this bug, we need not bother.
1114 </li>
1115 <li>
1116 Comment - Enter comments that will be visible along with the attachments.
1117 You could elaborate on the attachment here, if needed.
1118 </li>
1119 </ul>
1120
1121 <p>
1122 With respect to Content Type, here are a few more details. You can check the
1123 "patch" checkbox if you're submitting a patch. Otherwise, you could ask
1124 Bugzilla to "auto-detect" the file type (not advisable). The other options are
1125 "select from list", which is most frequently used. Use plain text (text/plain)
1126 for <e>most</e> attachments except binary files like images (which can use
1127 image/gif, image/jpeg or image/png depending on type) or compressed files like
1128 .tar.bz2 which would use application/octet-stream as content type.
1129 </p>
1130
1131
1132 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-attach-comp.png" caption="New Attachment Completed"/>
1133
1134 <p>
1135 We submit <path>strace.log</path> and it is reflected on the bug report.
1136 </p>
1137
1138 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-strace.png" caption="Attached strace log"/>
1139
1140 <p>
1141 We've mentioned before that sometimes ebuilds will tell you to attach a file in
1142 the emerge error. An example can be seen below.
1143 </p>
1144
1145 <pre caption="Example File Attachment Request">
1146 configure: error: PNG support requires ZLIB. Use --with-zlib-dir=&lt;DIR&gt;
1147
1148 !!! Please attach the config.log to your bug report:
1149 !!! /var/tmp/portage/php-5.0.3-r1/work/php-5.0.3/config.log
1150
1151 !!! ERROR: dev-php/php-5.0.3-r1 failed.
1152 !!! Function econf, Line 485, Exitcode 0
1153 !!! econf failed
1154 !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
1155 </pre>
1156
1157 <p>
1158 Please attach any file mentioned like this to your bug report.
1159 </p>
1160
1161 <p>
1162 Sometimes a developer might ask you to attach a diff or patch for a file.
1163 Standard diff files can be obtained through:
1164 </p>
1165
1166 <pre caption="Standard Diff Creation">
1167 $ <i>cp file file.old</i>
1168 $ <i>nano file</i>
1169 $ <i>diff -u file.old file</i>
1170 </pre>
1171
1172 <p>
1173 For C/C++ source files, the <b>-p</b> flag is added to show what function calls
1174 the diff applies to:
1175 </p>
1176
1177 <pre caption="Diff-ing C/C++ source">
1178 $ <i>cp file.c file.c.old</i>
1179 $ <i>nano file.c</i>
1180 $ <i>diff -up file.c.old file.c</i>
1181 </pre>
1182
1183 <p>
1184 The documentation team will require the flag combination <b>-Nt</b> as well as
1185 <b>-u</b>. This mainly has to do with tab expansion. You can create such a diff
1186 with:
1187 </p>
1188
1189 <pre caption="Documentation diffs">
1190 $<i> cp file.xml file.xml.old</i>
1191 $<i> nano file.xml</i>
1192 $<i> diff -Nut file.xml.old file.xml</i>
1193 </pre>
1194
1195 <p>
1196 And your diff is created. While we're doing all this, suppose another person
1197 finds your bug by searching through bugzilla and is curious to keep track of
1198 the bug, they may do so by putting their email in the Add CC field of the bug
1199 as shown below. You could also keep track of other bugs by following the same
1200 method.
1201 </p>
1202
1203 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-add-email.png" caption="Adding Email To CC:"/>
1204
1205 <note>
1206 Email addresses must be registered with Gentoo Bugzilla. In order to CC multiple
1207 addresses, simply separate them with commas or spaces.
1208 </note>
1209
1210 <p>
1211 After all this work, the bug can undergo various status markings. This is
1212 usually done by the Gentoo Developers and sometimes by the reporter. The
1213 following are the various possible states a bug may go through during its
1214 lifetime.
1215 </p>
1216
1217 <ul>
1218 <li>
1219 UNCONFIRMED - You're generally not going to see this too often. This means
1220 that a bug reporter has opened a bug using the advanced method and is
1221 uncertain his or her bug is an actual bug.
1222 </li>
1223 <li>NEW - Bugs that are first opened are considered new.</li>
1224 <li>
1225 ASSIGNED - When the person you've assigned the bug too validates your bug,
1226 it will often receive ASSIGNED status while they figure out the issue.
1227 This lets you know that they've accepted your bug as a real bug.
1228 </li>
1229 <li>
1230 REOPENED - Someone has resolved a bug and you think the solution is not
1231 feasible or the problem still persists. At this point, you may re-open the
1232 bug. Please <b>do not abuse this</b>. If a developer closes the bug a
1233 second or third time, chances are that your bug is closed.
1234 </li>
1235 <li>
1236 RESOLVED - A firm decision has been taken on the bug. Usually goes onto
1237 FIXED to indicate the bug is solved and the matter closed although various
1238 other resolutions are possible. We'll look into those a little later.
1239 </li>
1240 <li>
1241 VERIFIED - The steps take to work the bug are correct. This is usually a QA
1242 thing.
1243 </li>
1244 <li>
1245 CLOSED - Basically means RIP for the bug and it's buried under the never
1246 ending flow of new bugs.
1247 </li>
1248 </ul>
1249
1250 <p>
1251 Now shortly afterward, we find the error in the strace log and fix the bug and
1252 mark it as RESOLVED FIXED and mention that there was a change in the location
1253 of configuration files, and that I will update the ebuild with a warning about
1254 it. The bug now becomes resolved, and you are shown the following.
1255 </p>
1256
1257 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-reso.png" caption="Resolved Bug"/>
1258
1259 <p>
1260 A little below, you'll see the following:
1261 </p>
1262
1263 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-options.png" caption="Bug Options"/>
1264
1265 <p>
1266 This gives you the option of Reopening the bug if you wish to (i.e. the
1267 developer thinks it's resolved but it's really not to your standards). Now our
1268 bug is fixed! However, different resolutions can occur. Here's a small list:
1269 </p>
1270
1271 <ul>
1272 <li>
1273 FIXED - The bug is fixed, follow the instructions to resolve your issue.
1274 </li>
1275 <li>
1276 INVALID - You did not do something specifically documented, causing the
1277 bug.
1278 </li>
1279 <li>DUPLICATE - You didn't use this guide and reported a duplicate bug.</li>
1280 <li>
1281 WORKSFORME - Developer/person assigned the bug cannot reproduce your error.
1282 </li>
1283 <li>
1284 CANTFIX - Somehow the bug cannot be solved because of certain
1285 circumstances. These circumstances will be noted by the person taking the
1286 bug.
1287 </li>
1288 <li>
1289 WONTFIX - This is usually applied to new ebuilds or feature requests.
1290 Basically the developer does not want to add a certain feature because it
1291 is not needed, a better alternative exists, or it's just plain broken.
1292 Sometimes you may be given a solution to get said issue resolved.
1293 </li>
1294 <li>
1295 UPSTREAM - The bug cannot be fixed by the Gentoo development team, and have
1296 requested you take the problem upstream (the people that actually made the
1297 program) for review. Upstream has a few ways of handling bugs. These
1298 include mailing lists, irc channels, and even bug reporting systems. If
1299 you're not sure how to contact them, ask in the bug and someone will point
1300 you to the right direction.
1301 </li>
1302 </ul>
1303
1304 <p>
1305 Sometimes, before the bug can be resolved, a developer may request that you
1306 test an updated ebulid. In the next chapter we'll take a look at testing
1307 ebuilds.
1308 </p>
1309
1310 </body>
1311 </section>
1312 </chapter>
1313
1314 <chapter>
1315 <title>Testing Ebuilds</title>
1316 <section>
1317 <title>Getting The Files</title>
1318 <body>
1319
1320 <p>
1321 Let's say that you reported a bug for the foobar2 compile fix from earlier. Now
1322 developers might find out what the problem is and might need you to test the
1323 ebuild for them to be sure it works for you as well:
1324 </p>
1325
1326 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-ebuild-request.png" caption="Ebuild Test Request"/>
1327
1328 <p>
1329 Some rather confusing vocabulary is used here. First off, let's see what an
1330 overlay is. An overlay is a special directory like <path>/usr/portage</path>,
1331 the difference being that when you <c>emerge sync</c>, files contained within it
1332 will not be deleted. Luckily, a special <path>/usr/local/portage</path>
1333 directory is created for that purpose. Let's go ahead and set our portage
1334 overlay in<path>/etc/make.conf</path>. Open make.conf up in your favorite editor
1335 and add this towards the end.
1336 </p>
1337
1338 <pre caption="Setting Up PORTDIR_OVERLAY">
1339 PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
1340 </pre>
1341
1342 <p>
1343 Now we'll want to create the appropriate directories to put our test ebuild
1344 files in. In this case, we're supposed to put them in sys-apps/foobar2. You'll
1345 notice that the second comment asks for a <path>files</path> directory for the
1346 patch. This directory holds other required files that aren't included with
1347 the standard source archive (patches, init.d scripts, etc). This is a subdir in
1348 the package directory called <path>files</path>. Go ahead and create these
1349 directories:
1350 </p>
1351
1352 <pre caption="Setting Up The Category And Package Directories">
1353 # <i>mkdir -p /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/foobar2/files</i>
1354 </pre>
1355
1356 <note>
1357 The -p in mkdir creates not only the directory you want but also any missing
1358 parent directories as well (sys-apps and foobar2 in this case).
1359 </note>
1360
1361 <p>
1362 Ok now, we can go ahead and download the files. First, download the ebuild
1363 into <path>/usr/local/portage/sys-apps/foobar2</path>, and then add the patch
1364 to <path>/usr/local/portage/sys-apps/foobar2/files</path>. Now that we have the
1365 files, we can begin working on testing the ebuild.
1366 </p>
1367
1368 </body>
1369 </section>
1370 <section>
1371 <title>Testing The ebuild</title>
1372 <body>
1373
1374 <p>
1375 The process to create an ebuild that can be used by emerge is fairly simple. You
1376 must create a Manifest file for the ebuild. This can be done with
1377 the ebuild command. Run it as shown.
1378 </p>
1379
1380 <pre caption="Creating the Manifest file">
1381 # <i>ebuild foobar2-1.0.ebuild manifest</i>
1382 &gt;&gt;&gt; Creating Manifest for /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/foobar2
1383 </pre>
1384
1385 <p>
1386 Now let's test to see if it works as it should.
1387 </p>
1388
1389 <pre caption="Testing With emerge -pv">
1390 # <i>emerge -pv foobar2</i>
1391
1392 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
1393
1394 Calculating dependencies ...done!
1395 [ebuild N ] sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 0 kB [1]
1396
1397 Total size of downloads: 0 kB
1398 Portage overlays:
1399 [1] /usr/local/portage
1400 </pre>
1401
1402 <p>
1403 It does seem to have worked! You'll notice the [1] next to the [ebuild] line.
1404 That points to <path>/usr/local/portage</path>, which is the overlay we created
1405 earlier. Now we go ahead and emerge the package.
1406 </p>
1407
1408 <pre caption="Emerge Result">
1409 # <i>emerge foobar2</i>
1410 Calculating dependencies ...done!
1411 <comment>(compile info snipped)</comment>
1412 >>> Unpacking foobar2-1.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/foobar2-1.0/work
1413 * Applying foobar2-1.0-Makefile.patch ... [ ok ]
1414 <comment>(compile info snipped)</comment>
1415 >>> Merging sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 to /
1416 >>> chris +sandbox(preinst)
1417 --- /usr/
1418 --- /usr/bin/
1419 >>> /usr/bin/foobar2
1420 </pre>
1421
1422 <p>
1423 In the first section we see that the emerge started off as it should. The second
1424 section shows our patch being applied successfully by the "[ ok ]" status
1425 message to the right. The last section tells us the program compiled ok. The
1426 patch works! Now we can go and let the developer know that their patch works
1427 fine, and that they can commit the fix to portage.
1428 </p>
1429
1430 </body>
1431 </section>
1432 <section>
1433 <title>Conclusion</title>
1434 <body>
1435
1436 <p>
1437 This concludes the howto on working with Bugzilla. I hope you find this useful.
1438 If you have any questions, comments, or ideas regarding this document, please
1439 send them to me at <mail>chriswhite@gentoo.org</mail>. Special thanks go to
1440 moreon for his notes on -g flags and compile errors, the people at #gentoo-bugs
1441 for helping out with bug-wrangling, Griffon26 for his notes on
1442 maintainer-needed, robbat2 for general suggestions and fox2mike for fixing up
1443 the doc and adding stuff as needed.
1444 </p>
1445
1446 </body>
1447 </section>
1448 </chapter>
1449 </guide>

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.20