| 1 |
<?xml version='1.0' encoding="UTF-8"?> |
| 2 |
<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-install-filesystems.xml,v 1.1 2008/03/01 14:15:57 neysx Exp $ --> |
| 3 |
<!DOCTYPE included SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd"> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
<included> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
<version>2</version> |
| 8 |
<date>2008-03-02</date> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
<section id="filesystemsdesc"> |
| 11 |
<title>Filesystems</title> |
| 12 |
<body> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
<p test="contains('x86 Alpha',func:keyval('arch'))"> |
| 15 |
The Linux kernel supports various filesystems. We'll explain ext2, ext3, |
| 16 |
ReiserFS, XFS and JFS as these are the most commonly used filesystems on Linux |
| 17 |
systems. |
| 18 |
</p> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='IA64'"> |
| 21 |
The Linux kernel supports various filesystems. We'll explain vfat, ext2, ext3, |
| 22 |
ReiserFS, XFS and JFS as these are the most commonly used filesystems on Linux |
| 23 |
systems. |
| 24 |
</p> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='AMD64'"> |
| 27 |
Several filesystems are available. Some of them are found stable on the amd64 |
| 28 |
architecture, others aren't. The following filesystems are found to be stable: |
| 29 |
ext2 and ext3. jfs and reiserfs may work but need more testing. If you're |
| 30 |
really adventurous you can try the other filesystems. |
| 31 |
</p> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='arm'"> |
| 34 |
Several filesystems are available. Some of them are found stable on the arm |
| 35 |
architecture, others aren't. ext2 and ext3 are found to be stable. JFS and |
| 36 |
ReiserFS may work but need more testing. If you're really adventurous you can |
| 37 |
try the other filesystems. |
| 38 |
</p> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='HPPA'"> |
| 41 |
Several filesystems are available. Ext2, ext3, XFS and reiserfs are found |
| 42 |
stable on the HPPA architecture. The others are very experimental. |
| 43 |
</p> |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='MIPS'"> |
| 46 |
Several filesystems are available. ReiserFS, EXT2 and EXT3 are found stable on |
| 47 |
the MIPS architectures, others are experimental. |
| 48 |
</p> |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='PPC'"> |
| 51 |
Several filesystems are available for use on the PowerPC architecture including |
| 52 |
ext2, ext3, ReiserFS and XFS, each with their strengths and faults. |
| 53 |
</p> |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
<note test="func:keyval('arch')='PPC64'"> |
| 56 |
Several filesystems are available. ext2, ext3 and ReiserFS support is built in |
| 57 |
the Installation CD kernels. JFS and XFS support is available through kernel |
| 58 |
modules. |
| 59 |
</note> |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='SPARC'"> |
| 62 |
Several filesystems are available, some are known to be stable on the |
| 63 |
SPARC architecture. Ext2 and ext3, for example, are known to work well. |
| 64 |
Alternate filesystems may not function correctly. |
| 65 |
</p> |
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
<note test="func:keyval('arch')='Alpha'"> |
| 68 |
<c>aboot</c> only supports booting from <b>ext2</b> and <b>ext3</b> |
| 69 |
partitions. |
| 70 |
</note> |
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
</body> |
| 73 |
<body> |
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
<p test="func:keyval('arch')='IA64'"> |
| 76 |
<b>vfat</b> is the MS-DOS filesystem, updated to allow long filenames. It is |
| 77 |
also the only filesystem type that the EFI firmware on ia64 systems |
| 78 |
understands. The boot partition on ia64 systems should always be vfat, but for |
| 79 |
your data partitions you should use one of the other filesystems listed below. |
| 80 |
</p> |
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
<p> |
| 83 |
<b>ext2</b> is the tried and true Linux filesystem but doesn't have metadata |
| 84 |
journaling, which means that routine ext2 filesystem checks at startup time can |
| 85 |
be quite time-consuming. There is now quite a selection of newer-generation |
| 86 |
journaled filesystems that can be checked for consistency very quickly and are |
| 87 |
thus generally preferred over their non-journaled counterparts. Journaled |
| 88 |
filesystems prevent long delays when you boot your system and your filesystem |
| 89 |
happens to be in an inconsistent state. |
| 90 |
</p> |
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
<p> |
| 93 |
<b>ext3</b> is the journaled version of the ext2 filesystem, providing metadata |
| 94 |
journaling for fast recovery in addition to other enhanced journaling modes like |
| 95 |
full data and ordered data journaling. It uses an HTree index that enables high |
| 96 |
performance in almost all situations. In short, ext3 is a very good and reliable |
| 97 |
filesystem. Ext3 is the recommended all-purpose all-platform filesystem. |
| 98 |
</p> |
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
</body> |
| 101 |
<body test="not(func:keyval('arch')='SPARC')"> |
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
<p test="not(func:keyval('arch')='PPC')"> |
| 104 |
<b>JFS</b> is IBM's high-performance journaling filesystem. JFS is a light, |
| 105 |
fast and reliable B+tree-based filesystem with good performance in various |
| 106 |
conditions. |
| 107 |
</p> |
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
<p> |
| 110 |
<b>ReiserFS</b> is a B+tree-based journaled filesystem that has good overall |
| 111 |
performance, especially when dealing with many tiny files at the cost of more |
| 112 |
CPU cycles. ReiserFS appears to be less maintained than other filesystems. |
| 113 |
</p> |
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
<p> |
| 116 |
<b>XFS</b> is a filesystem with metadata journaling which comes with a robust |
| 117 |
feature-set and is optimized for scalability. XFS seems to be less forgiving to |
| 118 |
various hardware problems. |
| 119 |
</p> |
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
</body> |
| 122 |
</section> |
| 123 |
</included> |
Parent Directory
| 
Revision Log