| 1 |
GLEP: 14
|
| 2 |
Title: security updates based on GLSA
|
| 3 |
Version: $Revision: 1.1 $
|
| 4 |
Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/08/22 15:00:55 $
|
| 5 |
Author: Marius Mauch <genone@genone.de>,
|
| 6 |
Status: Draft
|
| 7 |
Type: Standards Track
|
| 8 |
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
| 9 |
Created: 18 Aug 2003
|
| 10 |
Post-History: 22-Aug-2003
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Abstract
|
| 14 |
========
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
There is currently no automatic way to check a Gentoo system for identified
|
| 17 |
security holes or auto-apply security fixes. This GLEP proposes a way to deal
|
| 18 |
with this issue
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Motivation
|
| 22 |
==========
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Automatic checking for security updates is a often requested feature for Gentoo.
|
| 25 |
Implementing it will enable users to fix security holes without reading every
|
| 26 |
security announcement. It's also a feature that is often required in enterprise
|
| 27 |
environments.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Proposed change
|
| 31 |
===============
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Update tool
|
| 34 |
-----------
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
The coding part of this GLEP is a update tool that reads a GLSA, checks if
|
| 37 |
the system is affected by it and executes one of the following actions, depending
|
| 38 |
on user preferences:
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
- run all steps necessary to fix the security hole, including package updates and
|
| 41 |
daemon restarts.
|
| 42 |
- instruct the user how to fix the security hole.
|
| 43 |
- print the GLSA so the user can get more information if desired.
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Once this tool is implemented and well tested it can be integrated into portage.
|
| 46 |
A prototype `implementation`_ for this tool exists.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
GLSA format
|
| 50 |
-----------
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
The GLSA format needs to be specified, I suggest using XML for that to simplify
|
| 53 |
parsing and later extensions. See `implementation`_ for a sample DTD. The format
|
| 54 |
has to be compatible with the update tool of course. If necessary a converter
|
| 55 |
tool or an editor could be written for people not comfortable with XML.
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
GLSA release process
|
| 59 |
--------------------
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
Additional to sending the GLSA to the gentoo-announce mailing list it has to be
|
| 62 |
stored on a HTTP/FTP server and in the portage tree. I'd suggest a script should
|
| 63 |
be used to release a GLSA that will:
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
- check the GLSA for correctness
|
| 66 |
- send a mail to gentoo-announce with the XML GLSA and a plaintext version attached
|
| 67 |
- upload it to www.gentoo.org/glsa (or wherever they should be uploaded)
|
| 68 |
- put it on the rsync server
|
| 69 |
- notify the moderators on the forums to make an announcement
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
Portage changes
|
| 73 |
---------------
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
Until the `update tool`_ is integrated into portage there will be no code changes
|
| 76 |
to portage. The update tool might require a few new configuration options, these
|
| 77 |
could be placed in make.conf or another config file in /etc/portage.
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
Rationale
|
| 81 |
=========
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
The lack of automated security updates for Gentoo is one of the most often requested
|
| 84 |
features for portage as it is one of the standard features of other distributions.
|
| 85 |
As Gentoo already provides GLSAs for important security bugs it is only natural
|
| 86 |
to use these to implement this feature.
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
To parse a GLSA in a program the format needs to be specified and a parser has
|
| 89 |
to be written. I suggest the use of XML for future GLSAs for the following reasons:
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
- can be parsed and validated with existing libraries
|
| 92 |
- easy to extend while maintaining backwards compatibility
|
| 93 |
- tools can convert XML GLSAs in other formats, the other direction would be harder
|
| 94 |
- websites can use XSLT to markup GLSAs
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
Putting the GLSAs in the portage tree allows all users to check their systems
|
| 97 |
for security updates without taking more actions and simplifies later integration
|
| 98 |
of the update tool into portage. For security minded persons the GLSAs are
|
| 99 |
available on a HTTP server to ease the load of the rsync servers.
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
Implementation
|
| 103 |
==============
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
A prototype implementation (including the update tool, a DTD and a sample
|
| 106 |
XMLified GLSA) exists at http://gentoo.devel-net.org/glsa/ . This GLEP is based
|
| 107 |
on that implementation, though it can be changed or rewritten if necessary.
|
| 108 |
According to portage developers there is also already some support for this in
|
| 109 |
portage.
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
Backwards compatibility
|
| 113 |
=======================
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
The current `GLSA release process`_ needs to be replaced with this proposal. It
|
| 116 |
would be nice if old GLSAs would be transformed into XML as well, but that is
|
| 117 |
not a requirement for this GLEP.
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
Copyright
|
| 121 |
=========
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
| 124 |
|