/[gentoo]/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0017.txt
Gentoo

Contents of /xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0017.txt

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 1.1 - (hide annotations) (download)
Mon Nov 24 14:20:23 2003 UTC (10 years, 7 months ago) by liquidx
Branch: MAIN
File MIME type: text/plain
adding glep 17 and 18

1 liquidx 1.1 GLEP: 17
2     Title: Resolution for Aging EBuilds
3     Version: $Revision: 1.1 $
4     Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/11/21 02:32:05 $
5     Author: Caleb Tennis <caleb@gentoo.org>
6     Status: Draft
7     Type: Standards Track
8     Content-Type: text/x-rst
9     Created: 21-Nov-2003
10     Post-History: 24-Nov-2003
11    
12    
13     Abstract
14     ========
15    
16     Many of the ebuild scripts found within Gentoo's Portage have come as a direct
17     result of user submission via Gentoo's Bugzilla interface. However, a large number
18     of open ebuild requests remain in Bugzilla. This GLEP attempts to resolve these
19     requests.
20    
21     Motivation
22     ==========
23    
24     As of the first draft of this GLEP, there are 1517 EBUILD bug requests in
25     Gentoo's bugzilla database. These requests generally fall into three categories:
26    
27     1. The package is important to Gentoo users, but has simply has not yet made
28     its way into Portage.
29    
30     2. The package is mostly unimportant to Gentoo users
31    
32     3. No ebuild has been provided with the bug request.
33    
34     Leaving these requests open does not help Gentoo. Not only does the bug count
35     become artifically inflated, but bug maintenance also becomes more difficult adding
36     to open requests that developers must sift through.
37    
38     Furthermore, having a policy in place as to how ebuild bug requests are handled is
39     important for consistency and accountability.
40    
41     Rationale
42     =========
43    
44     Portage simply cannot contain an automated ebuild for every software package available.
45     Ebuilds that are included are done so mostly based on the whim and knowledge of
46     developers. Many software packages are of interest only to a small subset of end users,
47     and as such would be a misuse of resources by including in Portage.
48    
49    
50     Implementation
51     ==============
52    
53     This implementation applies only to requests which have been idle in the database
54     for an extended period of time. The recommended time is *90* days.
55    
56     After this period, the bugs should be handled in the follow manner:
57    
58     * The bug should be closed as a WONTFIX
59     * The following note should be included in the description:
60     ``No developer has sponsored the ebuild within 90 days of request.
61     Closing per GLEP policy #xx``
62    
63    
64     Repercussions
65     =============
66    
67     The (systematic) denial of the inclusion of ebuilds into the Portage tree may leave
68     some users to feel slighted because their ebuild was not accepted into Portage.
69     This is an unfortunate side effect of a system that relies on acceptal or denial.
70    
71    
72     Future
73     ======
74    
75     It may be desirable to provide an official repository for abandoned ebuilds to go.
76     Any attachments to these bug reports could be placed here, so that the author's effort
77     has not gone in vein.
78    
79    
80     Backwards Compatibility
81     =======================
82    
83     No current policies exist that interfere with this document.
84    
85    
86     References
87     ==========
88    
89     .. [#GLEP2] GLEP 2, Sample ReStructuredText GLEP Template, Goodyear,
90     (http://glep.gentoo.org/glep-0002.html)
91    
92    
93     Copyright
94     =========
95    
96     This document has been placed in the public domain.

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.20