| 1 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
GLEP: 20
|
| 2 |
|
|
Title: /srv - Services Home Directory Support
|
| 3 |
|
|
Version: $Revision: $
|
| 4 |
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date: $
|
| 5 |
|
|
Author: Stuart Herbert <stuart@gentoo.org>, Rob Holland <tigger@gentoo.org>
|
| 6 |
|
|
Status: Draft
|
| 7 |
|
|
Type: Standards Track
|
| 8 |
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
| 9 |
|
|
Created: 09-Feb-2004
|
| 10 |
|
|
Post-History: 21-Feb-2004
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
Thanks To
|
| 13 |
|
|
=========
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
Thanks to Robin H. Johnson (robbat2@gentoo.org) for his assistance in writing
|
| 16 |
|
|
this GLEP.
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
|
Abstract
|
| 19 |
|
|
========
|
| 20 |
|
|
|
| 21 |
|
|
This GLEP proposes a new root-level directory - /srv - as an optional home
|
| 22 |
|
|
for the data (and sometimes the software too) for software that provides
|
| 23 |
|
|
services.
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
/srv will be supported via a USE flag. This gives users the choice
|
| 26 |
|
|
of using a dedicated service home hierarchy or not.
|
| 27 |
|
|
|
| 28 |
|
|
/srv is defined in FHS 2.3, which is part of the upcoming LSB v2.0 release
|
| 29 |
|
|
(http://bugs.freestandards.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16)
|
| 30 |
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
|
Motivation
|
| 32 |
|
|
==========
|
| 33 |
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
|
Gentoo currently does not provide sufficiently flexible support for
|
| 35 |
|
|
sites which wish to consolidate the data for their service-orientated
|
| 36 |
|
|
software under one simple, easy to administer, location.
|
| 37 |
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
|
Adding optional support for the /srv directory structure will give
|
| 39 |
|
|
sites increased flexibility on how to layout their machines.
|
| 40 |
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
|
Specification
|
| 42 |
|
|
=============
|
| 43 |
|
|
|
| 44 |
|
|
A new global USE flag - srvdir - will be added to Portage.
|
| 45 |
|
|
|
| 46 |
|
|
Ebuilds that choose to support the srvdir USE flag will configure the
|
| 47 |
|
|
package to install and use their data under the /srv directory.
|
| 48 |
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
|
Ebuilds that choose to support the srvdir USE flag - and which install
|
| 50 |
|
|
packages that need write access to the same directories that the
|
| 51 |
|
|
software is installed into - will configure the package to install
|
| 52 |
|
|
the software under the /srv directory.
|
| 53 |
|
|
|
| 54 |
|
|
All packages configured to support the srvdir USE flag will support
|
| 55 |
|
|
this breakdown of /srv:
|
| 56 |
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
|
/srv/<fqdn>/<service>/<service-specific tree>
|
| 58 |
|
|
|
| 59 |
|
|
where
|
| 60 |
|
|
<fqdn> is the fully-qualified domain name
|
| 61 |
|
|
<service> is the name of the service
|
| 62 |
|
|
<service-specific tree> is unique to the package
|
| 63 |
|
|
|
| 64 |
|
|
Ebuilds that install anything into /srv will install into /srv/localhost.
|
| 65 |
|
|
/srv/localhost - or any of the <service> directories underneath it - may be
|
| 66 |
|
|
symlinks created by the local administrator.
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
|
Examples
|
| 69 |
|
|
========
|
| 70 |
|
|
|
| 71 |
|
|
For example, backup packages which support the srvdir USE flag could
|
| 72 |
|
|
save backup data under the /srv/<hostname>/backups directory for each
|
| 73 |
|
|
host on the network that they perform backups for.
|
| 74 |
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
|
For example, web-based applications which support the srvdir USE flag
|
| 76 |
|
|
could install their software under the /srv/localhost/www/htdocs directory.
|
| 77 |
|
|
Ebuilds for web-based applications which also support the vhost USE flag
|
| 78 |
|
|
will allow the user to install software under other service domains
|
| 79 |
|
|
through the webapp-config package. See GLEP #11 and the vhost-config tool for
|
| 80 |
|
|
more information on how this works.
|
| 81 |
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
|
There are many other packages that could support the srvdir USE flag -
|
| 83 |
|
|
including Portage itself.
|
| 84 |
|
|
|
| 85 |
|
|
For packages that do not support the srvdir USE flag, there is currently no
|
| 86 |
|
|
recommended default location to use - although /var/localhost may prove a
|
| 87 |
|
|
useful alternative.
|
| 88 |
|
|
|
| 89 |
|
|
Rationale
|
| 90 |
|
|
=========
|
| 91 |
|
|
|
| 92 |
|
|
Introducing optional support for the /srv directory will benefit a number of
|
| 93 |
|
|
groups of Gentoo users.
|
| 94 |
|
|
|
| 95 |
|
|
* Users who wish to have /usr mounted read-only
|
| 96 |
|
|
|
| 97 |
|
|
/srv provides an optional alternative for packages that install writable
|
| 98 |
|
|
files into /usr.
|
| 99 |
|
|
|
| 100 |
|
|
* Users who wish to isoloate services from /home utilisation
|
| 101 |
|
|
|
| 102 |
|
|
Services stop working when real users fill /home. As many packages cannot
|
| 103 |
|
|
detect or robustly cope with this situation, services that write files
|
| 104 |
|
|
to disk normally end up corrupting those files.
|
| 105 |
|
|
|
| 106 |
|
|
* Users who do not wish to export /var or its sub-directories
|
| 107 |
|
|
|
| 108 |
|
|
Exporting /var - or its subdirectories - via NFS et al is something that
|
| 109 |
|
|
some system administrators simply do not wish to do. Providing these users
|
| 110 |
|
|
with the choice of installing into /srv fits with the published Gentoo
|
| 111 |
|
|
philosophy of allowing users as much choice as possible.
|
| 112 |
|
|
|
| 113 |
|
|
* Users who share resources via NFS, or who use Network-Attached Storage (NAS)
|
| 114 |
|
|
|
| 115 |
|
|
Allowing system administrators to choose to configure service-providing
|
| 116 |
|
|
software to use a single file hierarchy will greatly simply the management
|
| 117 |
|
|
and maintenance of NFS exports - and imports - in clustered environments.
|
| 118 |
|
|
|
| 119 |
|
|
* Service providers, who host more than one customer's services on a machine
|
| 120 |
|
|
|
| 121 |
|
|
Grouping all the storage (web, ftp, databases, IMAP, etc etc) under one
|
| 122 |
|
|
location greatly simplifies managing disk quotas on that host.
|
| 123 |
|
|
|
| 124 |
|
|
It is common practice for shared hosted systems to place web sites,
|
| 125 |
|
|
ftp sites and so on under a user's actual home directory. This practice
|
| 126 |
|
|
requires the user's home directory to be world-readable, which does not
|
| 127 |
|
|
promote strong security!
|
| 128 |
|
|
|
| 129 |
|
|
* Users who wish to store service-orientated files onto a single logical
|
| 130 |
|
|
volume to support future growth
|
| 131 |
|
|
|
| 132 |
|
|
The Gentoo Philosophy clearly states that Gentoo Linux will be a
|
| 133 |
|
|
highly-configurable meta-distribution. Adding optional support for /srv is
|
| 134 |
|
|
very much in keeping with our Philosophy.
|
| 135 |
|
|
|
| 136 |
|
|
Implementation
|
| 137 |
|
|
==============
|
| 138 |
|
|
|
| 139 |
|
|
A new USE flag - srvdir - will be added to Portage.
|
| 140 |
|
|
|
| 141 |
|
|
Ebuilds and eclasses will choose to support the srvdir USE flag or not on
|
| 142 |
|
|
an individual basis.
|
| 143 |
|
|
|
| 144 |
|
|
(Author's note: If this GLEP is approved, all web-based applications will
|
| 145 |
|
|
support the srvdir USE flag through the work being carried out under GLEP #11)
|
| 146 |
|
|
|
| 147 |
|
|
There has been some debate about whether the /srv directory should be provided
|
| 148 |
|
|
by the basesystem package or not. Because this support is optional, and
|
| 149 |
|
|
because different sites will have different storage requirements, we believe
|
| 150 |
|
|
that it should be left to the local Gentoo system administrator to manually
|
| 151 |
|
|
create the /srv directory.
|
| 152 |
|
|
|
| 153 |
|
|
If baselayout feels that it must install a /srv, then we propose that
|
| 154 |
|
|
baselayout installs /srv as a symlink to /var/srv. This approach will support
|
| 155 |
|
|
installations that mount the root filesystem read-only.
|
| 156 |
|
|
|
| 157 |
|
|
Backwards Compatibility
|
| 158 |
|
|
=======================
|
| 159 |
|
|
|
| 160 |
|
|
Users who choose not to use the new srvdir USE flag will see little to no
|
| 161 |
|
|
change. It is likely that some ebuilds will change their non-srvdir directory
|
| 162 |
|
|
layout to reduce the amount of effort required to support both options.
|
| 163 |
|
|
|
| 164 |
|
|
Copyright
|
| 165 |
|
|
=========
|
| 166 |
|
|
|
| 167 |
|
|
This document is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share
|
| 168 |
|
|
Alike license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0)
|