| 1 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
GLEP: 28 |
| 2 |
|
|
Title: "Expiration" of inactive GLEPs |
| 3 |
g2boojum |
1.2 |
Version: $Revision: 1.1 $ |
| 4 |
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date: 2004/06/02 23:25:58 $ |
| 5 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
Author: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@gentoo.org> |
| 6 |
|
|
Status: Draft |
| 7 |
|
|
Type: Standards Track |
| 8 |
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst |
| 9 |
|
|
Created: 2-Jun-2004 |
| 10 |
g2boojum |
1.2 |
Post-History: 2-Jun-2004, 20-Jul-2004 |
| 11 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
| 13 |
g2boojum |
1.2 |
Status |
| 14 |
|
|
====== |
| 15 |
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
This GLEP was approved on 14-Jun-2004. |
| 17 |
|
|
|
| 18 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
Abstract |
| 19 |
|
|
======== |
| 20 |
|
|
|
| 21 |
|
|
To keep inactive GLEPs from lingering in a limbo state, Draft GLEPs that have |
| 22 |
|
|
been inactive for more than 60 days and Accepted GLEPs that have been |
| 23 |
|
|
inactive for over six months should be marked "deferred" due to inactivity |
| 24 |
|
|
(and, presumably, lack of interest). |
| 25 |
|
|
|
| 26 |
|
|
|
| 27 |
|
|
Motivation |
| 28 |
|
|
========== |
| 29 |
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
|
Right now a number of GLEPs have been in "Draft" status for as much as 11 |
| 31 |
|
|
months, with no obvious activity occurring to either submit the GLEP for |
| 32 |
|
|
approval or to withdraw it as a bad idea. Similarly, although it has not yet |
| 33 |
|
|
really been a problem, Accepted GLEPs also have the potential to linger |
| 34 |
|
|
without any indication that they are moving forward toward being finalized. |
| 35 |
|
|
Having a "timeout" period for GLEPs should spur GLEP authors to remain active |
| 36 |
|
|
in either getting support for or finalizing GLEPs. |
| 37 |
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
|
Specification |
| 39 |
|
|
============= |
| 40 |
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
|
If a Draft GLEP is inactive for more than 60 days or an Accepted GLEP is |
| 43 |
|
|
inactive for more than six months, then it would be marked as "deferred" on |
| 44 |
|
|
the main `GLEP page`_. Inactivity is defined simply as the GLEP author has |
| 45 |
|
|
not contacted the GLEP editors with either an update or a request to submit |
| 46 |
|
|
the GLEP for approval (in the case of a Draft GLEP) or a request that the GLEP |
| 47 |
|
|
be marked final (in the case of an Accepted GLEP). |
| 48 |
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
|
.. _GLEP page: http://glep.gentoo.org |
| 50 |
|
|
|
| 51 |
|
|
A GLEP that has been marked "deferred" may be reopened by request of the GLEP |
| 52 |
|
|
author or a Gentoo manager, as long as that request also includes either an |
| 53 |
|
|
update or a note submitting the GLEP for approval or finalization. |
| 54 |
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
|
Rationale |
| 56 |
|
|
========= |
| 57 |
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
|
The GLEP editors have better things to do than chase after GLEP authors to |
| 59 |
|
|
find out how their GLEPs are progressing. This GLEP should help. |
| 60 |
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
|
|
| 62 |
|
|
Backwards Compatibility |
| 63 |
|
|
======================= |
| 64 |
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
|
Not really an issue here. |
| 66 |
|
|
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
|
Copyright |
| 69 |
|
|
========= |
| 70 |
|
|
|
| 71 |
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain. |