| 1 |
GLEP: 47 |
| 2 |
Title: Creating 'safe' environment variables |
| 3 |
Version: $Revision: 1.8 $ |
| 4 |
Last-Modified: $Date: 2006/01/26 20:56:55 $ |
| 5 |
Author: Diego Pettenò, Fabian Groffen <{flameeyes,grobian}@gentoo.org> |
| 6 |
Status: Active |
| 7 |
Type: Standards Track |
| 8 |
Content-Type: text/x-rst |
| 9 |
Created: 14-Oct-2005 |
| 10 |
Post-History: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Credits |
| 14 |
======= |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The text of this GLEP is a result of a discussion and input of the |
| 17 |
following persons, in no particular order: Mike Frysinger, Diego |
| 18 |
Pettenò, Fabian Groffen and Finn Thain. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Abstract |
| 22 |
======== |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
In order for ebuilds and eclasses to be able to make host specific |
| 25 |
decisions, it is necessary to have a number of environmental variables |
| 26 |
which allow for such decisions. This GLEP introduces some measures that |
| 27 |
need to be made to make these decisions 'safe', by making sure the |
| 28 |
variables the decisions are based on are 'safe'. A small overlap with |
| 29 |
GLEP 22 [1]_ is being handled in this GLEP where the use of 2-tuple |
| 30 |
keywords are being kept instead of 4-tuple keywords. Additionally, the |
| 31 |
``ELIBC``, ``KERNEL`` and ``ARCH`` get auto filled starting from |
| 32 |
``CHOST`` and the 2-tuple keyword, instead of solely from they 4-tuple |
| 33 |
keyword as proposed in GLEP 22. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
The destiny of the ``USERLAND`` variable is out of the scope of this |
| 36 |
GLEP. Depending on its presence in the tree, it may be decided to set |
| 37 |
this variable the same way we propose to set ``ELIBC``, ``KERNEL`` and |
| 38 |
``ARCH``, or alternatively, e.g. via the profiles. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Motivation |
| 42 |
========== |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
The Gentoo/Alt project is in an emerging state to get ready to serve a |
| 45 |
plethora of 'alternative' configurations such as FreeBSD, NetBSD, |
| 46 |
DragonflyBSD, GNU/kFreeBSD, Mac OS X, (Open)Darwin, (Open)Solaris and so |
| 47 |
on. As such, the project is in need for a better grip on the actual |
| 48 |
host being built on. This information on the host environment is |
| 49 |
necessary to make proper (automated) decisions on settings that are |
| 50 |
highly dependant on the build environment, such as platform or as in |
| 51 |
[2]_. |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Rationale |
| 55 |
========= |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Gentoo's unique Portage system allows easy installation of applications |
| 58 |
from source packages. Compiling sources is prone to many environmental |
| 59 |
settings and availability of certain tools. Only recently the Gentoo |
| 60 |
for FreeBSD project has started, as second Gentoo project that operates |
| 61 |
on a foreign host operating system using foreign (non-GNU) C-libraries |
| 62 |
and userland utilities. Such projects suffer from the current implicit |
| 63 |
assumption made within Gentoo Portage's ebuilds that there is a single |
| 64 |
type of operating system, C-libraries and system utilities. In order to |
| 65 |
enable ebuilds -- and also eclasses -- to be aware of these |
| 66 |
environmental differences, information regarding it should be supplied. |
| 67 |
Since decisions based on this information can be vital, it is of high |
| 68 |
importance that this information can be trusted and the values can be |
| 69 |
considered 'safe' and correct. |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
Backwards Compatibility |
| 73 |
======================= |
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
The proposed keywording scheme in this GLEP is fully compatible with the |
| 76 |
current situation of the portage tree, this in contrast to GLEP 22. The |
| 77 |
variables provided by GLEP 22 can't be extracted from the new keyword, |
| 78 |
but since GLEP 22-style keywords aren't in the tree at the moment, that |
| 79 |
is not a problem. The same information can be extracted from the CHOST |
| 80 |
variable, if necessary. No modifications to ebuilds will have to be |
| 81 |
made. |
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
Specification |
| 85 |
============= |
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
Unlike GLEP 22 the current keyword scheme as used in practice is not |
| 88 |
changed. Instead of proposing a 4-tuple [3]_ keyword, a 2-tuple |
| 89 |
keyword is chosen for archs that require them. Archs for which a |
| 90 |
1-tuple keyword suffices, keep that keyword. Since this doesn't change |
| 91 |
anything to the current situation in the tree, it is considered to be a |
| 92 |
big advantage over the 4-tuple keyword from GLEP 22. This GLEP is an |
| 93 |
official specification of the syntax of the keyword. |
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
Keywords will consist out of two parts separated by a hyphen ('-'). The |
| 96 |
left hand part of the keyword 2-tuple is the architecture, such as |
| 97 |
ppc64, sparc and x86. The right hand part indicates the operating |
| 98 |
system or distribution, such as linux, macos, darwin, obsd, etc. If the |
| 99 |
right hand part is omitted, it implies the operating system/distribution |
| 100 |
type is GNU/Linux. In such case the hyphen is also omitted. Examples |
| 101 |
of such keywords are ppc-darwin and x86. This is fully compatible with |
| 102 |
the current keywords used in the tree. |
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
The variables ``ELIBC``, ``KERNEL`` and ``ARCH`` are currently set in |
| 105 |
the profiles when other than their defaults for a GNU/Linux system. |
| 106 |
They can as such easily be overridden and defined by the user. To |
| 107 |
prevent this from happening, the variables should be auto filled by |
| 108 |
Portage itself, based on the ``CHOST`` variable. |
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
A map file can be used to have the various ``CHOST`` values being |
| 111 |
translated to the correct values for the four variables. This change is |
| 112 |
invisible for ebuilds and eclasses, but allows to rely on these |
| 113 |
variables as they are based on a 'safe' value -- the ``CHOST`` variable. |
| 114 |
Ebuilds should not be sensitive to the keyword value, but use the |
| 115 |
aforementioned four variables instead. They allow specific tests for |
| 116 |
properties. If this is undesirable, the full ``CHOST`` variable can be |
| 117 |
used to match a complete operating system. |
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
Current USE-expansion is being maintained, for backwards compatibility. |
| 120 |
Since the expansion is based on the variables mentioned above which do |
| 121 |
not change, but only in the way they are generated, there should be no |
| 122 |
problem in maintaining them. |
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
Variables |
| 126 |
--------- |
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
The ``ELIBC``, ``KERNEL``, ``ARCH`` variables are filled from a profile |
| 129 |
file. The file can be overlaid, such that the following entries in the |
| 130 |
map file (on the left of the arrow) will result in the assigned |
| 131 |
variables on the right hand side of the arrow: |
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
:: |
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
*-*-linux-* -> KERNEL="linux" |
| 136 |
*-*-*-gnu -> ELIBC="glibc" |
| 137 |
*-*-kfreebsd-gnu -> KERNEL="FreeBSD" ELIBC="glibc" |
| 138 |
*-*-freebsd* -> KERNEL="FreeBSD" ELIBC="FreeBSD" |
| 139 |
*-*-darwin* -> KERNEL="Darwin" ELIBC="Darwin" |
| 140 |
*-*-netbsd* -> KERNEL="NetBSD" ELIBC="NetBSD" |
| 141 |
*-*-solaris* -> KERNEL="Solaris" ELIBC="Solaris" |
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
A way to achieve this is proposed by Mike Frysinger [4]_, which |
| 144 |
suggests to have a env-map file, for instance filled with: |
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
:: |
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
% cat env-map |
| 149 |
*-linux-* KERNEL=linux |
| 150 |
*-gnu ELIBC=glibc |
| 151 |
x86_64-* ARCH=amd64 |
| 152 |
|
| 153 |
then the following bash script can be used to set the four variables to |
| 154 |
their correct values: |
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
:: |
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
% cat readmap |
| 159 |
#!/bin/bash |
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
CBUILD=${CBUILD:-${CHOST=${CHOST:-$1}}} |
| 162 |
[[ -z ${CHOST} ]] && echo need chost |
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
unset KERNEL ELIBC ARCH |
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
while read LINE ; do |
| 167 |
set -- ${LINE} |
| 168 |
targ=$1 |
| 169 |
shift |
| 170 |
[[ ${CBUILD} == ${targ} ]] && eval $@ |
| 171 |
done < env-map |
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
echo ARCH=${ARCH} KERNEL=${KERNEL} ELIBC=${ELIBC} |
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
Given the example env-map file, this script would result in: |
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
:: |
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
% ./readmap x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |
| 180 |
ARCH=amd64 KERNEL=linux ELIBC=glibc |
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
It should be noted, however, that the bash script is a proof of concept |
| 183 |
implementation. It cannot be used as Portage will need this |
| 184 |
information, which is written in Python. Hence, an equivalent of this |
| 185 |
bash script should be written in Python to be able to use it within |
| 186 |
Portage. This is considered to be a non-issue coding wise. |
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
References |
| 190 |
========== |
| 191 |
|
| 192 |
.. [1] GLEP 22, New "keyword" system to incorporate various |
| 193 |
userlands/kernels/archs, Goodyear, |
| 194 |
(http://glep.gentoo.org/glep-0022.html) |
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
.. [2] For example in the perl ebuild, it is necessary to |
| 197 |
fill in the C-library part, which on a FreeBSD system is other than |
| 198 |
on a Linux system and currently is handled as follows: |
| 199 |
:: |
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
[[ ${ELIBC} == "FreeBSD" ]] && myconf="${myconf} -Dlibc=/usr/lib/libc.a" |
| 202 |
|
| 203 |
.. [3] For the purpose of readability, we will refer to 1, 2 and |
| 204 |
4-tuples, even though tuple in itself suggest a field consisting of |
| 205 |
two values. For clarity: a 1-tuple describes a single value field, |
| 206 |
while a 4-tuple decribes a field consisting out of four values. |
| 207 |
|
| 208 |
.. [4] mailto:vapier [at) gentoo .dot org |
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
Copyright |
| 213 |
========= |
| 214 |
|
| 215 |
This document has been placed in the public domain. |