/[gentoo]/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.txt
Gentoo

Contents of /xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.txt

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 1.3 - (hide annotations) (download)
Tue Sep 5 20:36:38 2006 UTC (8 years, 2 months ago) by g2boojum
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.2: +3 -3 lines
File MIME type: text/plain
update post dates

1 g2boojum 1.1 GLEP: 48
2     Title: QA Team's Role and Purpose
3 g2boojum 1.3 Version: $Revision: 1.2 $
4     Last-Modified: $Date: 2006/09/05 20:34:26 $
5 g2boojum 1.1 Author: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@gentoo.org>,
6 g2boojum 1.2 Status: Final
7 g2boojum 1.1 Type: Standards Track
8     Content-Type: text/x-rst
9     Created: 24 April 2006
10 g2boojum 1.3 Post-History: 24-Apr-2006, 5-Sep-2006
11 g2boojum 1.1
12    
13     Abstract
14     ========
15    
16     This GLEP outlines the abilities and purpose of the Quality Assurance team
17     for Gentoo.
18    
19     Motivation
20     ==========
21    
22     For years now developers have been saying how we need an empowered QA team to
23     handle problems concerning the tree. This GLEP provides the structure for
24     such a team and specifies the roles the team would fulfill.
25    
26     Specification
27     =============
28    
29     The QA team should be given certain abilities to look out for the best
30     interests of all developers, as well as our users. The QA team should also
31     work to ensure developers have the information they need, and that packages
32     are maintained.
33    
34     * The QA team's purpose is to provide cross-team assistance in keeping the
35     tree in a good state. This is done primarily by finding and pointing out
36     issues to maintainers and, where necessary, taking direct action.
37     * In case of emergency, or if package maintainers refuse to cooperate,
38     the QA team may take action themselves to fix the problem. The QA team
39     does not want to override the maintainer's wishes by default, but only
40     wish to do so when the team finds it is in the best interest of users and
41     fellow developers to have the issue addressed as soon as possible.
42     * The QA team may also offer to fix obvious typos and similar minor issues,
43     and silence from the package maintainers can be taken as agreement in such
44     situations. Coding style issues fall under this category, and while they
45     are not severe, they can make automated checks of the tree more difficult.
46     * There will be cases when our tools are incapable of handling a certain
47     situation and policy must be broken in order to get something working
48     completely. This will hopefully not occur very often but each time it
49     does occur, the QA team and the maintainer will come to some agreement on
50     an interim solution and it is expected that a bug will be opened with the
51     appropriate team to work towards a correct solution.
52     * In the case of disagreement among QA members the majority of established
53     QA members must agree with the action. Some examples of disagreements are:
54     whether the percieved problem violates the policy or whether the solution
55     makes the situation worse.
56     * In the event that a developer still insists that a package does not break
57     QA standards, an appeal can be made at the next council meeting. The package
58     should be dealt with per QA's request until such a time that a decision is
59     made by the council.
60     * Just because a particular QA violation has yet to cause an issue does not
61     change the fact that it is still a QA violation.
62     * If a particular developer persistently causes breakage, the QA team
63     may request that devrel re-evaluates that developer's commit rights.
64     Evidence of past breakages will be presented with this request to devrel.
65     * The QA team will maintain a list of current "QA Standards" with explanations
66     as to why they are problems, and how to fix the problem. The list is not
67     meant by any means to be a comprehensive document, but rather a dynamic
68     document that will be updated as new problems are discovered. The QA team
69     will also do their best to ensure all developer tools are in line with the
70     current QA standards.
71     * In order to join the QA team, you must be a developer for at least 4 months
72     and must ask the current lead for approval.
73     * The QA team will work with Recruiters to keep related documentation and
74     quizzes up to date, so that up and coming developers will have access to all
75     of the necessary information to avoid past problems.
76     * QA will take an active role in cleaning up and removing from the tree
77     unmaintained packages as they are found to be broken. It is also
78     encouraged of members of the QA team to assist in mentoring new developers
79     that wish to take over unmaintained packages/herds.
80    
81    
82     Backwards Compatibility
83     =======================
84    
85     Not a problem for this GLEP.
86    
87     Copyright
88     =========
89    
90     This document has been placed in the public domain.

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.20