--- xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0050.txt	2006/06/15 14:36:52	1.1
+++ xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0050.txt	2006/06/15 15:29:18	1.2
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 GLEP: 50
 Title: Supporting alternative package managers
-Version: $Revision: 1.1 $
-Last-Modified: $Date: 2006/06/15 14:36:52 $
+Version: $Revision: 1.2 $
+Last-Modified: $Date: 2006/06/15 15:29:18 $
 Author: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@gentoo.org>
 Status: Draft
 Type: Standards Track
@@ -49,15 +49,20 @@
 being able to build installation media, providing a transition path from
 or to the existing official package manager, etcetera.
 
-Note
-====
+Notes
+=====
 
-An early criticism of this GLEP was that it fails to address eclasses and
-profiles.  As far as eclasses are concerned, my view is that the above rules
-suffice, since eclasses only matter in their use in ebuilds.  If a package
-manager can effectively process all ebuilds, then it must be handling the
-eclasses successfully, too.  Profiles, on the other hand, are not addressed
-here even implicitly.
+* An early criticism of this GLEP was that it fails to address eclasses and
+  profiles.  As far as eclasses are concerned, my view is that the above rules
+  suffice, since eclasses only matter in their use in ebuilds.  If a package
+  manager can effectively process all ebuilds, then it must be handling the
+  eclasses successfully, too.  Profiles, on the other hand, are not addressed
+  here even implicitly.
+* Assuming the ebuild specification is successfully finished, then the   
+  first rule should really replace "all ebuilds supported by the official
+  package manager" with "all ebuilds that satisfy the ebuild spec".  
+  Similarly, in rule two "by the official package manager" should
+  read "by the official ebuild spec".
 
 Backwards Compatibility
 =======================