| 1 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
GLEP: 50
|
| 2 |
|
|
Title: Supporting alternative package managers
|
| 3 |
g2boojum |
1.3 |
Version: $Revision: 1.2 $
|
| 4 |
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date: 2006/06/15 15:29:18 $
|
| 5 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
Author: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@gentoo.org>
|
| 6 |
g2boojum |
1.3 |
Status: Rejected
|
| 7 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
Type: Standards Track
|
| 8 |
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
| 9 |
|
|
Created: 22-May-2006
|
| 10 |
g2boojum |
1.3 |
Post-History: 15-Jun-2006, 6-Sep-2006
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
Status
|
| 13 |
|
|
======
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
The council rejected this GLEP in favor of starting from a package manager
|
| 16 |
|
|
API and requiring Gentoo package managers in the tree to support that
|
| 17 |
|
|
API. (That API is still pending, however.)
|
| 18 |
|
|
|
| 19 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
|
| 20 |
|
|
Abstract
|
| 21 |
|
|
========
|
| 22 |
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
|
To support alternatives to the official package manager (portage, at the time
|
| 24 |
|
|
of this writing), some sane ground rules need to be set. Specifically, no
|
| 25 |
|
|
alternative ebuild-based package manager may be added to the tree unless it
|
| 26 |
|
|
successfully works with all ebuilds supported by the official package manager.
|
| 27 |
|
|
Moreover, no ebuilds may be added to the tree unless they are supported
|
| 28 |
|
|
(without change) by the official package manager.
|
| 29 |
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
|
Specification
|
| 32 |
|
|
=============
|
| 33 |
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
|
* No alternative ebuild-based package manager may be added
|
| 35 |
|
|
to the tree unless it successfully works with all ebuilds supported by
|
| 36 |
|
|
the official package manager. If an alternative package manager is
|
| 37 |
|
|
runtime incompatible with the official package manager, then it
|
| 38 |
|
|
must be masked and provide appropriate warnings.
|
| 39 |
|
|
* No ebuilds may be added to the tree unless they are supported
|
| 40 |
|
|
(without change) by the official package manager.
|
| 41 |
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
|
Rationale
|
| 43 |
|
|
=========
|
| 44 |
|
|
|
| 45 |
|
|
The first rule sets a reasonable bar for adding an alternative package
|
| 46 |
|
|
manager to the tree. Note that if an ebuild currently in the tree
|
| 47 |
|
|
doesn't work with the official package manager, it isn't expected to
|
| 48 |
|
|
work with an alternative package manager either. The second rule
|
| 49 |
|
|
ensures that an alternative package manager cannot become a de-facto
|
| 50 |
|
|
requirement by supporting packages that the official package manager
|
| 51 |
|
|
cannot handle.
|
| 52 |
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
|
In order to keep this proposal as simple and focused as possible, it has
|
| 54 |
|
|
nothing to say about the process by which an alternative package manager
|
| 55 |
|
|
might one day become the official package manager. It is assumed that
|
| 56 |
|
|
sanity will reign, and no package manager will become official without
|
| 57 |
|
|
being able to build installation media, providing a transition path from
|
| 58 |
|
|
or to the existing official package manager, etcetera.
|
| 59 |
|
|
|
| 60 |
g2boojum |
1.2 |
Notes
|
| 61 |
|
|
=====
|
| 62 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
|
| 63 |
g2boojum |
1.2 |
* An early criticism of this GLEP was that it fails to address eclasses and
|
| 64 |
|
|
profiles. As far as eclasses are concerned, my view is that the above rules
|
| 65 |
|
|
suffice, since eclasses only matter in their use in ebuilds. If a package
|
| 66 |
|
|
manager can effectively process all ebuilds, then it must be handling the
|
| 67 |
|
|
eclasses successfully, too. Profiles, on the other hand, are not addressed
|
| 68 |
|
|
here even implicitly.
|
| 69 |
|
|
* Assuming the ebuild specification is successfully finished, then the
|
| 70 |
|
|
first rule should really replace "all ebuilds supported by the official
|
| 71 |
|
|
package manager" with "all ebuilds that satisfy the ebuild spec".
|
| 72 |
|
|
Similarly, in rule two "by the official package manager" should
|
| 73 |
|
|
read "by the official ebuild spec".
|
| 74 |
g2boojum |
1.1 |
|
| 75 |
|
|
Backwards Compatibility
|
| 76 |
|
|
=======================
|
| 77 |
|
|
|
| 78 |
|
|
Pretty much the whole point, and it's explicit here.
|
| 79 |
|
|
|
| 80 |
|
|
|
| 81 |
|
|
Copyright
|
| 82 |
|
|
=========
|
| 83 |
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|