Contents of /xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log

Revision 1.9 - (show annotations) (download) (as text)
Wed Feb 14 21:30:15 2007 UTC (11 years, 11 months ago) by nightmorph
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.8: +58 -3 lines
File MIME type: application/xml
added a section on zero-day bump requests to the bugzilla guide for bug 166809

1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
2 <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd">
3 <!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml,v 1.8 2006/11/10 22:19:40 nightmorph Exp $ -->
5 <guide link="/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml">
6 <title>Gentoo Bug Reporting Guide</title>
8 <author title="Author">
9 <mail link="chriswhite@gentoo.org">Chris White</mail>
10 </author>
11 <author title="Editor">
12 <mail link="fox2mike@gentoo.org">Shyam Mani</mail>
13 </author>
15 <abstract>
16 This document shows the proper method of reporting bugs using Bugzilla.
17 </abstract>
19 <!-- The content of this document is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license -->
20 <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 -->
21 <license/>
23 <version>1.8</version>
24 <date>2007-02-14</date>
26 <chapter>
27 <title>Introduction</title>
28 <section>
29 <title>Preface</title>
30 <body>
32 <p>
33 One of the factors that delay a bug being fixed is the way it is reported. By
34 creating this guide, we hope to help improve the communication between
35 developers and users in bug resolution. Getting bugs fixed is an important, if
36 not crucial part of the quality assurance for any project and hopefully this
37 guide will help make that a success.
38 </p>
40 </body>
41 </section>
42 <section>
43 <title>Bugs!!!!</title>
44 <body>
46 <p>
47 You're emerge-ing a package or working with a program and suddenly the worst
48 happens -- you find a bug. Bugs come in many forms like emerge failures or
49 segmentation faults. Whatever the cause, the fact still remains that such a bug
50 must be fixed. Here is a few examples of such bugs.
51 </p>
53 <pre caption="A run time error">
54 $ <i>./bad_code `perl -e 'print Ax100'`</i>
55 Segmentation fault
56 </pre>
58 <pre caption="An emerge failure">
59 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.2/include/g++-v3/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2:
60 warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated
61 header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section of
62 the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the &lt;X&gt; header for the &lt;X.h&gt;
63 header for C++ includes, or &lt;sstream&gt; instead of the deprecated header
64 &lt;strstream.h&gt;. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
65 In file included from main.cc:40:
66 menudef.h:55: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
67 OXPopupMenu*'
68 menudef.h:62: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
69 OXPopupMenu*'
70 menudef.h:70: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
71 OXPopupMenu*'
72 menudef.h:78: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
73 OXPopupMenu*'
74 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoOpen()':
75 main.cc:323: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
76 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoSave(char*)':
77 main.cc:337: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
78 make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
79 make[1]: Leaving directory
80 `/var/tmp/portage/xclass-0.7.4/work/xclass-0.7.4/example-app'
81 make: *** [shared] Error 2
83 !!! ERROR: x11-libs/xclass-0.7.4 failed.
84 !!! Function src_compile, Line 29, Exitcode 2
85 !!! 'emake shared' failed
86 </pre>
88 <p>
89 These errors can be quite troublesome. However, once you find them, what do you
90 do? The following sections will look at two important tools for handling run
91 time errors. After that, we'll take a look at compile errors, and how to handle
92 them. Let's start out with the first tool for debugging run time errors --
93 <c>gdb</c>.
94 </p>
96 </body>
97 </section>
98 </chapter>
101 <chapter>
102 <title>Debugging using GDB</title>
103 <section>
104 <title>Introduction</title>
105 <body>
107 <p>
108 GDB, or the (G)NU (D)e(B)ugger, is a program used to find run time errors that
109 normally involve memory corruption. First off, let's take a look at what
110 debugging entails. One of the main things you must do in order to debug a
111 program is to <c>emerge</c> the program with <c>FEATURES="nostrip"</c>. This
112 prevents the stripping of debug symbols. Why are programs stripped by default?
113 The reason is the same as that for having gzipped man pages -- saving space.
114 Here's how the size of a program varies with and without debug symbol stripping.
115 </p>
117 <pre caption="Filesize Comparison">
118 <comment>(debug symbols stripped)</comment>
119 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 3140 6/28 13:11 bad_code
120 <comment>(debug symbols intact)</comment>
121 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 6374 6/28 13:10 bad_code
122 </pre>
124 <p>
125 Just for reference, <e>bad_code</e> is the program we'll be debugging with
126 <c>gdb</c> later on. As you can see, the program without debugging symbols is
127 3140 bytes, while the program with them is 6374 bytes. That's close to double
128 the size! Two more things can be done for debugging. The first is adding ggdb3
129 to your CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS. This flag adds more debugging information than is
130 generally included. We'll see what that means later on. This is how
131 <path>/etc/make.conf</path> <e>might</e> look with the newly added flags.
132 </p>
134 <pre caption="make.conf settings">
135 CFLAGS="-O1 -pipe -g -ggdb"
137 </pre>
139 <p>
140 Lastly, you can also add debug to the package's USE flags. This can be done
141 with the <path>package.use</path> file.
142 </p>
144 <pre caption="Using package.use to add debug USE flag">
145 # <i>echo "category/package debug" >> /etc/portage/package.use</i>
146 </pre>
148 <note>
149 The directory <path>/etc/portage</path> does not exist by default and you may
150 have to create it, if you have not already done so. If the package already has
151 USE flags set in <path>package.use</path>, you will need to manually modify them
152 in your favorite editor.
153 </note>
155 <p>
156 Then we re-emerge the package with the modifications we've done so far as shown
157 below.
158 </p>
160 <pre caption="Re-emergeing a package with debugging">
161 # <i>FEATURES="nostrip" emerge package</i>
162 </pre>
164 <p>
165 Now that debug symbols are setup, we can continue with debugging the program.
166 </p>
168 </body>
169 </section>
170 <section>
171 <title>Running the program with GDB</title>
172 <body>
174 <p>
175 Let's say we have a program here called "bad_code". Some person claims that the
176 program crashes and provides an example. You go ahead and test it out:
177 </p>
179 <pre caption="Breaking The Program">
180 $ <i>./bad_code `perl -e 'print Ax100'`</i>
181 Segmentation fault
182 </pre>
184 <p>
185 It seems this person was right. Since the program is obviously broken, we have
186 a bug at hand. Now, it's time to use <c>gdb</c> to help solve this matter. First
187 we run <c>gdb</c> with <c>--args</c>, then give it the full program with
188 arguments like shown:
189 </p>
191 <pre caption="Running Our Program Through GDB">
192 $ <i>gdb --args ./bad_code `perl -e 'print Ax100'`</i>
193 GNU gdb 6.3
194 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
195 GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
196 welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
197 Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
198 There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
199 This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
200 </pre>
202 <note>
203 One can also debug with core dumps. These core files contain the same
204 information that the program would produce when run with gdb. In order to debug
205 with a core file with bad_code, you would run <c>gdb ./bad_code core</c> where
206 core is the name of the core file.
207 </note>
209 <p>
210 You should see a prompt that says "(gdb)" and waits for input. First, we have to
211 run the program. We type in <c>run</c> at the command and receive a notice like:
212 </p>
214 <pre caption="Running the program in GDB">
215 (gdb) <i>run</i>
216 Starting program: /home/chris/bad_code
218 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
219 0xb7ec6dc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
220 </pre>
222 <p>
223 Here we see the program starting, as well as a notification of SIGSEGV, or
224 Segmentation Fault. This is GDB telling us that our program has crashed. It
225 also gives the last run function it could trace when the program crashes.
226 However, this isn't too useful, as there could be multiple strcpy's in the
227 program, making it hard for developers to find which one is causing the issue.
228 In order to help them out, we do what's called a backtrace. A backtrace runs
229 backwards through all the functions that occurred upon program execution, to the
230 function at fault. Functions that return (without causing a crash) will not show
231 up on the backtrace. To get a backtrace, at the (gdb) prompt, type in <c>bt</c>.
232 You will get something like this:
233 </p>
235 <pre caption="Program backtrace">
236 (gdb) <i>bt</i>
237 #0 0xb7ec6dc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
238 #1 0x0804838c in run_it ()
239 #2 0x080483ba in main ()
240 </pre>
242 <p>
243 You can notice the trace pattern clearly. main() is called first, followed by
244 run_it(), and somewhere in run_it() lies the strcpy() at fault. Things such as
245 this help developers narrow down problems. There are a few exceptions to the
246 output. First off is forgetting to enable debug symbols with
247 <c>FEATURES="nostrip"</c>. With debug symbols stripped, the output looks something
248 like this:
249 </p>
251 <pre caption="Program backtrace With debug symbols stripped">
252 (gdb) <i>bt</i>
253 #0 0xb7e2cdc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
254 #1 0x0804838c in ?? ()
255 #2 0xbfd19510 in ?? ()
256 #3 0x00000000 in ?? ()
257 #4 0x00000000 in ?? ()
258 #5 0xb7eef148 in libgcc_s_personality () from /lib/libc.so.6
259 #6 0x080482ed in ?? ()
260 #7 0x080495b0 in ?? ()
261 #8 0xbfd19528 in ?? ()
262 #9 0xb7dd73b8 in __guard_setup () from /lib/libc.so.6
263 #10 0xb7dd742d in __guard_setup () from /lib/libc.so.6
264 #11 0x00000006 in ?? ()
265 #12 0xbfd19548 in ?? ()
266 #13 0x080483ba in ?? ()
267 #14 0x00000000 in ?? ()
268 #15 0x00000000 in ?? ()
269 #16 0xb7deebcc in __new_exitfn () from /lib/libc.so.6
270 #17 0x00000000 in ?? ()
271 #18 0xbfd19560 in ?? ()
272 #19 0xb7ef017c in nullserv () from /lib/libc.so.6
273 #20 0xb7dd6f37 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
274 #21 0x00000001 in ?? ()
275 #22 0xbfd195d4 in ?? ()
276 #23 0xbfd195dc in ?? ()
277 #24 0x08048201 in ?? ()
278 </pre>
280 <p>
281 This backtrace contains a large number of ?? marks. This is because without
282 debug symbols, <c>gdb</c> doesn't know how the program was run. Hence, it is
283 crucial that debug symbols are <e>not</e> stripped. Now remember a while ago we
284 mentioned the -ggdb flag. Let's see what the output looks like with the flag
285 enabled:
286 </p>
288 <pre caption="Program backtrace with -ggdb3">
289 (gdb) <i>bt</i>
290 #0 0xb7e4bdc0 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
291 #1 0x0804838c in run_it (input=0x0) at bad_code.c:7
292 #2 0x080483ba in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfd3a434) at bad_code.c:12
293 </pre>
295 <p>
296 Here we see that a lot more information is available for developers. Not only is
297 function information displayed, but even the exact line numbers of the source
298 files. This method is the most preferred if you can spare the extra space.
299 Here's how much the file size varies between debug, strip, and -ggdb enabled
300 programs.
301 </p>
303 <pre caption="Filesize differences With -ggdb flag">
304 <comment>(debug symbols stripped)</comment>
305 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 3140 6/28 13:11 bad_code
306 <comment>(debug symbols enabled)</comment>
307 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 6374 6/28 13:10 bad_code
308 <comment>(-ggdb flag enabled)</comment>
309 -rwxr-xr-x 1 chris users 19552 6/28 13:11 bad_code
310 </pre>
312 <p>
313 As you can see, -ggdb adds about <e>13178</e> more bytes to the file size over
314 the one with debugging symbols. However, as shown above, this increase in file
315 size can be worth it if presenting debug information to developers. The
316 backtrace can be saved to a file by copying and pasting from the terminal (if
317 it's a non-x based terminal, you can use gpm. To keep this doc simple, I
318 recommend you read up on the <uri link="/doc/en/gpm.xml#doc_chap4">documentation
319 for gpm</uri> to see how to copy and paste with it). Now that we're done with
320 <c>gdb</c>, we can quit.
321 </p>
323 <pre caption="Quitting GDB">
324 (gdb) <i>quit</i>
325 The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) <i>y</i>
326 $
327 </pre>
329 <p>
330 This ends the walk-through of <c>gdb</c>. Using <c>gdb</c>, we hope that you will
331 be able to use it to create better bug reports. However, there are other types
332 of errors that can cause a program to fail during run time. One of the other
333 ways is through improper file access. We can find those using a nifty little
334 tool called <c>strace</c>.
335 </p>
337 </body>
338 </section>
339 </chapter>
341 <chapter>
342 <title>Finding file access errors using strace</title>
343 <section>
344 <title>Introduction</title>
345 <body>
347 <p>
348 Programs often use files to fetch configuration information, access hardware or
349 write logs. Sometimes, a program attempts to reach such files incorrectly. A
350 tool called <c>strace</c> was created to help deal with this. <c>strace</c>
351 traces system calls (hence the name) which include calls that use the memory and
352 files. For our example, we're going to take a program foobar2. This is an
353 updated version of foobar. However, during the change over to foobar2, you notice
354 all your configurations are missing! In foobar version 1, you had it setup to
355 say "foo", but now it's using the default "bar".
356 </p>
358 <pre caption="Foobar2 With an invalid configuration">
359 $ <i>./foobar2</i>
360 Configuration says: bar
361 </pre>
363 <p>
364 Our previous configuration specifically had it set to foo, so let's use
365 <c>strace</c> to find out what's going on.
366 </p>
368 </body>
369 </section>
370 <section>
371 <title>Using strace to track the issue</title>
372 <body>
374 <p>
375 We make <c>strace</c> log the results of the system calls. To do this, we run
376 <c>strace</c> with the -o[file] arguments. Let's use it on foobar2 as shown.
377 </p>
379 <pre caption="Running foobar2 through strace">
380 # <i>strace -ostrace.log ./foobar2</i>
381 </pre>
383 <p>
384 This creates a file called <path>strace.log</path> in the current directory. We
385 check the file, and shown below are the relevant parts from the file.
386 </p>
388 <pre caption="A Look At the strace Log">
389 open(".foobar2/config", O_RDONLY) = 3
390 read(3, "bar", 3) = 3
391 </pre>
393 <p>
394 Aha! So There's the problem. Someone moved the configuration directory to
395 <path>.foobar2</path> instead of <path>.foobar</path>. We also see the program
396 reading in "bar" as it should. In this case, we can recommend the ebuild
397 maintainer to put a warning about it. For now though, we can copy over the
398 config file from <path>.foobar</path> and modify it to produce the correct
399 results.
400 </p>
402 </body>
403 </section>
404 <section>
405 <title>Conclusion</title>
406 <body>
408 <p>
409 Now we've taken care of finding run time bugs. These bugs prove to be
410 problematic when you try and run your programs. However, run time errors are
411 the least of your concerns if your program won't compile at all. Let's take a
412 look at how to address <c>emerge</c> compile errors.
413 </p>
415 </body>
416 </section>
417 </chapter>
419 <chapter>
420 <title>Handling emerge Errors</title>
421 <section>
422 <title>Introduction</title>
423 <body>
425 <p>
426 <c>emerge</c> errors, such as the one displayed earlier, can be a major cause
427 of frustration for users. Reporting them is considered crucial for maintaining
428 the health of Gentoo. Let's take a look at a sample ebuild, foobar2, which
429 contains some build errors.
430 </p>
432 </body>
433 </section>
434 <section id="emerge_error">
435 <title>Evaluating emerge Errors</title>
436 <body>
438 <p>
439 Let's take a look at this very simple <c>emerge</c> error:
440 </p>
442 <pre caption="emerge Error">
443 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-7.o foobar2-7.c
444 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-8.o foobar2-8.c
445 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-9.o foobar2-9.c
446 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2.o foobar2.c
447 foobar2.c:1:17: ogg.h: No such file or directory
448 make: *** [foobar2.o] Error 1
450 !!! ERROR: sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 failed.
451 !!! Function src_compile, Line 19, Exitcode 2
452 !!! Make failed!
453 !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message
454 </pre>
456 <p>
457 The program is compiling smoothly when it suddenly stops and presents an error message. This
458 particular error can be split into 3 different sections, The compile messages, the build
459 error, and the emerge error message as shown below.
460 </p>
462 <pre caption="Parts of the error">
463 <comment>(Compilation Messages)</comment>
464 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-7.o foobar2-7.c
465 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-8.o foobar2-8.c
466 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2-9.o foobar2-9.c
467 gcc -D__TEST__ -D__GNU__ -D__LINUX__ -L/usr/lib -I/usr/include -L/usr/lib/nspr/ -I/usr/include/fmod -c -o foobar2.o foobar2.c
469 <comment>(Build Error)</comment>
470 foobar2.c:1:17: ogg.h: No such file or directory
471 make: *** [foobar2.o] Error 1
473 <comment>(emerge Error)</comment>
474 !!! ERROR: sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 failed.
475 !!! Function src_compile, Line 19, Exitcode 2
476 !!! Make failed!
477 !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message
478 </pre>
480 <p>
481 The compilation messages are what lead up to the error. Most often, it's good to
482 at least include 10 lines of compile information so that the developer knows
483 where the compilation was at when the error occurred.
484 </p>
486 <p>
487 Make errors are the actual error and the information the developer needs. When
488 you see "make: ***", this is often where the error has occurred. Normally, you
489 can copy and paste 10 lines above it and the developer will be able to address
490 the issue. However, this may not always work and we'll take a look at an
491 alternative shortly.
492 </p>
494 <p>
495 The emerge error is what <c>emerge</c> throws out as an error. Sometimes, this
496 might also contain some important information. Often people make the mistake of
497 posting the emerge error and that's all. This is useless by itself, but with
498 make error and compile information, a developer can get what application and
499 what version of the package is failing. As a side note, make is commonly used as
500 the build process for programs (<b>but not always</b>). If you can't find a
501 "make: ***" error anywhere, then simply copy and paste 20 lines before the
502 emerge error. This should take care of most all build system error messages. Now
503 let's say the errors seem to be quite large. 10 lines won't be enough to catch
504 everything. That's where PORT_LOGDIR comes into play.
505 </p>
507 </body>
508 </section>
509 <section>
510 <title>emerge and PORT_LOGDIR</title>
511 <body>
513 <p>
514 PORT_LOGDIR is a portage variable that sets up a log directory for separate
515 emerge logs. Let's take a look and see what that entails. First, run your
516 emerge with PORT_LOGDIR set to your favorite log location. Let's say we have a
517 location <path>/var/log/portage</path>. We'll use that for our log directory:
518 </p>
520 <note>
521 In the default setup, <path>/var/log/portage</path> does not exist, and you will
522 most likely have to create it. If you do not, portage will fail to write the
523 logs.
524 </note>
526 <pre caption="emerge-ing With PORT_LOGDIR">
527 # <i>PORT_LOGDIR=/var/log/portage emerge foobar2</i>
528 </pre>
530 <p>
531 Now the emerge fails again. However, this time we have a log we can work with,
532 and attach to the bug later on. Let's take a quick look at our log directory.
533 </p>
535 <pre caption="PORT_LOGDIR Contents">
536 # <i>ls -la /var/log/portage</i>
537 total 16
538 drwxrws--- 2 root root 4096 Jun 30 10:08 .
539 drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 4096 Jun 30 10:08 ..
540 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7390 Jun 30 10:09 2115-foobar2-1.0.log
541 </pre>
543 <p>
544 The log files have the format [counter]-[package name]-[version].log. Counter
545 is a special variable that is meant to state this package as the n-th package
546 you've emerged. This prevents duplicate logs from appearing. A quick look at
547 the log file will show the entire emerge process. This can be attached later
548 on as we'll see in the bug reporting section. Now that we've safely obtained
549 our information needed to report the bug we can continue to do so. However,
550 before we get started on that, we need to make sure no one else has reported
551 the issue. Let's take a look at searching for bugs.
552 </p>
554 </body>
555 </section>
556 </chapter>
558 <chapter>
559 <title>Searching Using Bugzilla</title>
560 <section>
561 <title>Introduction</title>
562 <body>
564 <p>
565 <uri link="http://www.bugzilla.org">Bugzilla</uri> is what we at Gentoo use to
566 handle bugs. Gentoo's Bugzilla is reachable by HTTPS and HTTP. HTTPS is
567 available for those on insecure networks or simply paranoid :). For the sake of
568 consistency, we will be using the HTTPS version in the examples to follow. Head
569 over to <uri link="https://bugs.gentoo.org">Gentoo Bugs</uri> to see how it
570 looks.
571 </p>
573 <p>
574 One of the most frustrating things for developers and bug-wranglers is finding
575 duplicate bug reports. These cost them valuable time that they could otherwise
576 use to work on more important bugs. Often, this can be prevented by a few simple
577 search methods. So we're going to see how to search for bugs and find out if
578 you have one that's similar. For this example, we're going to use the xclass
579 emerge error that was used earlier.
580 </p>
582 <pre caption="xclass emerge error">
583 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.2/include/g++-v3/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2:
584 warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated
585 header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section of
586 the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the &lt;X&gt; header for the &lt;X.h&gt;
587 header for C++ includes, or &lt;sstream&gt; instead of the deprecated header
588 &lt;strstream.h&gt;. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
589 In file included from main.cc:40:
590 menudef.h:55: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
591 OXPopupMenu*'
592 menudef.h:62: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
593 OXPopupMenu*'
594 menudef.h:70: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
595 OXPopupMenu*'
596 menudef.h:78: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `
597 OXPopupMenu*'
598 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoOpen()':
599 main.cc:323: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
600 main.cc: In member function `void OXMain::DoSave(char*)':
601 main.cc:337: warning: unused variable `FILE*fp'
602 make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
603 make[1]: Leaving directory
604 `/var/tmp/portage/xclass-0.7.4/work/xclass-0.7.4/example-app'
605 make: *** [shared] Error 2
607 !!! ERROR: x11-libs/xclass-0.7.4 failed.
608 !!! Function src_compile, Line 29, Exitcode 2
609 !!! 'emake shared' failed
610 </pre>
612 <p>
613 So to begin searching, we head over to the <uri
614 link="https://bugs.gentoo.org/">Bugzilla Homepage</uri>.
615 </p>
617 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-homepage.png" caption="Bugzilla Homepage"/>
619 <p>
620 We'll click on "Query Existing bug reports". The reason why we choose this
621 over the basic bug search is because the basic bug search tends to give vague
622 results and often hinders users from looking through the results and finding the
623 duplicate bug. Once we click on the query screen, we reach the next page:
624 </p>
626 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-search.png" caption="Bugzilla Search Page"/>
628 <note>
629 If you've used the Advanced Search before, you'll most likely see that screen
630 instead.
631 </note>
633 <p>
634 Proceed by clicking on the "Advanced Search" link to bring up the Advanced
635 Search page.
636 </p>
638 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-adv-search.png" caption="Advanced Search Page"/>
640 <p>
641 This is how the Advanced Search Page looks like. While it may seem overwhelming
642 at first, we're going to look at a few simple areas to narrow down the rather
643 vague searches bugzilla returns.
644 </p>
646 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-content.png" caption="Content"/>
648 <p>
649 The first field is the summary of the bug. Here we're simply going to put the
650 name of the package that's crashing. If bugzie doesn't return results, try
651 removing the package name, just in case someone didn't put that in the summary
652 (highly unlikely, but we've seen a fair share of strange bug reports).
653 </p>
655 <p>
656 Product, Component, and Version should all be set to the default. This
657 prevents us from being too specific and missing all the bugs.
658 </p>
660 <p>
661 Comment is the important part. Use the comment field to list what appears to be a
662 specific instance of the error. Basically, don't use anything like the
663 beginning of the build error, find a line that's before it stating a true
664 error. Also, you'll want to filter out any punctuation to prevent bugzilla
665 from interpreting the results the comment the wrong way. Example from the xclass
666 emerge error:
667 </p>
669 <pre caption="Comment Line Content">
670 menudef.h:78: error: brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize `OXPopupMenu'
671 <comment>(Remove the quotes ' ')</comment>
672 menudef.h 78 error brace-enclosed initializer used to initialize OXPopupMenu
673 </pre>
675 <p>
676 The above is specific enough to where we'll find the bug without wading through
677 other xclass compile failure candidates.
678 </p>
680 <p>
681 URI, Whiteboard, and Keywords can all be left alone. What we've entered so far
682 should be enough to find our bug. Let's take a look at what we have filled out.
683 </p>
685 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-comp-search.png" caption="Completed Search Form"/>
687 <p>
688 Now we click on the Search button and here come the results...
689 </p>
691 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-search-result.png" caption="Search Results"/>
693 <p>
694 Only 2 bugs! That's a lot easier to deal with. We click on the first one to
695 check, and sure enough it's the one we're looking for.
696 </p>
698 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-located.png" caption="Bug Located"/>
700 <p>
701 Not only is it the one we want, but it has also been resolved. By checking the
702 last comment we see the solution and know what to do in order to resolve it.
703 Now, let's see what would have happened if we had not used the advanced search.
704 </p>
706 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-basic-search-result.png" caption="Basic Search Results"/>
708 <p>
709 4 more bugs to deal with! It gets even worse with larger packages. However,
710 with these simple tools, we're able to significantly narrow down the search to
711 try and locate a specific bug.
712 </p>
714 </body>
715 </section>
716 <section>
717 <title>Conclusion</title>
718 <body>
720 <p>
721 Let's say that you have searched and searched but still can't find a bug.
722 You've found yourself a new bug. Let's take a look at the bug reporting process
723 for submitting your new bug.
724 </p>
726 </body>
727 </section>
728 </chapter>
730 <chapter>
731 <title>Reporting Bugs</title>
732 <section>
733 <title>Introduction</title>
734 <body>
736 <p>
737 In this chapter, we'll figure out how to use Bugzilla to file a shiny, new bug.
738 Head over to <uri link="https://bugs.gentoo.org">Gentoo Bugs</uri> and...
739 </p>
741 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-homepage.png" caption="Bugzilla Homepage"/>
743 <p>
744 Click on "Report a Bug - Using the guided format".
745 </p>
747 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-prod-select.png" caption="Product Selection"/>
749 <p>
750 As you can see, <b>major</b> emphasis has been placed on putting your bug in the
751 right place. Gentoo Linux is where a large majority of bugs go.
752 </p>
754 <p>
755 Despite this, some people will file ebuild bugs in portage development
756 (assumption that portage team handles the portage tree) or infra (assumption
757 that infra has access to mirrors and rsync and can fix it directly). This is
758 simply not how things work.
759 </p>
761 <p>
762 Another common misconception occurs with our Documentation bugs. For example, a
763 user finds a bug with the <uri link="/proj/en/releng/catalyst/">Catalyst
764 Docs</uri>. The general tendency is to file a bug under Docs-user, which gets
765 assigned to the <uri link="http://gdp.gentoo.org">GDP</uri>, when it should
766 actually go to a member of the <uri link="/proj/en/releng/">Release
767 Engineering</uri> team. As a rule of thumb, only documentation under
768 <path>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/*</path> is under the GDP. Anything under
769 <path>http://www.gentoo.org/proj/*</path> is under the respective teams.
770 </p>
772 <note>
773 We would rather see a bug whose product was not supposed to be Gentoo Linux but
774 has been filed under the same rather than seeing a bug which belongs the Gentoo
775 Linux product and filed elsewhere. While neither is preferred, the former is more
776 acceptable and understandable (except website bugs.. we might have an issue with
777 that...).
778 </note>
780 <p>
781 Our bug goes in Gentoo Linux as it's an ebuild bug. We head over there and are
782 presented with the multi-step bug reporting process. Let us now proceed with
783 Step 1...
784 </p>
786 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-guide-step1.png" caption="Guided Format Step 1"/>
788 <p>
789 The first step here is really important (as the red text tells you). This is
790 where you search to see that someone else hasn't hit the same bug you have, yet.
791 If you do skip this step and a bug like yours already exists, it will be marked
792 as a DUPLICATE thus wasting a large amount of QA effort. To give you an idea,
793 the bug numbers that are struck out above are duplicate bugs. Now comes step 2,
794 where we give the information.
795 </p>
797 </body>
798 </section>
799 <section>
800 <title>Required Information</title>
801 <body>
803 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-basic.png" caption="Basic Information"/>
805 <p>
806 Let us take a closer look at what's what.
807 </p>
809 <ul>
810 <li>
811 First, there's the Product. The product will narrow down the bug to a
812 specific area of Gentoo like Bugzilla (for bugs relating to
813 bugs.gentoo.org), Docs-user(for User Documentation) or Gentoo Linux (for
814 ebuilds and the like).
815 </li>
816 <li>
817 Component is where exactly the problem occurs, more specifically which part
818 of selected product the bug comes under. This makes classification easier.
819 </li>
820 <li>
821 Hardware platform is what architecture you're running. If you were running
822 SPARC, you would set it to SPARC.
823 </li>
824 <li>
825 Operating System is what Operating System you're using. Because Gentoo is
826 considered a "Meta-distribution", it can run on other operating systems
827 beside Linux.
828 </li>
829 </ul>
831 <p>
832 So, for our example bug, we have :
833 </p>
835 <ul>
836 <li>Product - Gentoo Linux (Since it is an ebuild issue)</li>
837 <li>Component - Application (It is an application at fault, foobar2)</li>
838 <li>Hardware Platform - All (This error could occur across architectures)</li>
839 <li>Operation System - All (It could occur on all types of systems)</li>
840 </ul>
842 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-basic-comp.png" caption="Completed Basic Information"/>
844 <ul>
845 <li>
846 Build Identifier is basically the User Agent of the browser that is being
847 used to report the bugs (for logging purposes). You can just leave this as
848 is.
849 </li>
850 <li>
851 URL is optional and is used to point to errors on a site someplace
852 (pastebin, etc.). However, doing it inside the bug allows the developers be
853 able to reference to it at any time and is preferred.
854 </li>
855 <li>
856 In the Summary, you should put the package category, name, and number.
857 </li>
858 </ul>
860 <p>
861 Not including the category in the summary really isn't too bad, but it's
862 recommended. If you don't include the package name, however, we won't know what
863 you're filling a bug for, and will have to ask you about it later. The version
864 number is important for people searching for bugs. If 20 people filed bugs and
865 not one put a version number, how would people looking for similar bugs be able
866 to tell if one was there's? They'd have to look through every single bug, which
867 isn't too hard, but if there are say, 200 bugs.. it's not that easy. After all
868 the package information, you'll want to include a small description of the
869 incident. Here's an example:
870 </p>
872 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-summary.png" caption="Summary"/>
874 <p>
875 These simple rules can make handling bugs a lot easier. Next are the details.
876 Here we put in the information about the bug. We'll demonstrate with an example:
877 </p>
879 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-details.png" caption="Details"/>
881 <p>
882 Now the developer knows why we're filing the bug. They can then try to
883 reproduce it. Reproducibility tells us how often we were able to make the
884 problem recur. In this example, we can reproduce it any time simply by running
885 foobar2. Let's put that information in.
886 </p>
888 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-reprod.png" caption="Reproduction"/>
890 <p>
891 We have explained how we found the bug. The next step is to explain what were
892 the results we got and what we think they should actually be.
893 </p>
895 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-results.png" caption="Results"/>
897 <p>
898 We could then provide additional information. This could be things such as
899 stack traces, <b>sections</b> (since the whole log is usually big and of not
900 much use) of strace logs, but most importantly, your <c>emerge --info</c>
901 output. Here's an example.
902 </p>
904 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-addl-info.png" caption="Additional Information"/>
906 <p>
907 Lastly we select the severity of the bug. Please look this over carefully. In
908 most cases it's OK to leave it as is and someone will raise/lower it for you.
909 However, if you raise the severity of the bug, please make sure you read it over
910 carefully and make sure you're not making a mistake. A run down of the various
911 levels is given below.
912 </p>
914 <ul>
915 <li>
916 Blocker - The program just plain doesn't want to emerge or is a major
917 hinderance to the system. For example a <c>baselayout</c> issue which
918 prevents a system from booting up would be a sure candidate to be labelled
919 blocker.
920 </li>
921 <li>
922 Critical - The program has loss of data or severe memory leaks during
923 runtime. Again, an important program like say <c>net-tools</c> failing to
924 compile could be labelled critical. It won't prevent the system from
925 starting up, but is quite essential for day to day stuff.
926 </li>
927 <li>
928 Major - The program crashes, but nothing that causes your system severe
929 damage or information loss.
930 </li>
931 <li>
932 Minor - Your program crashes here and there with apparent workarounds.
933 </li>
934 <li>
935 Normal - The default. If you're not sure leave it here unless it's a new
936 build or cosmetic change, then read below for more information.
937 </li>
938 <li>Trivial - Things such as a mispelled word or whitespace clean up. </li>
939 <li>
940 Enhancement - A request to enable a new feature in a program, or more
941 specifically <e>new ebuilds</e>.
942 </li>
943 </ul>
945 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-sev.png" caption="Severity"/>
947 <p>
948 Here, we'll set it to Normal.
949 </p>
951 <p>
952 Now we can submit the bug report by clicking on the Submit Bug Report box. You
953 will now see your new bug come up. See <uri
954 link="https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97265">Bug 97561</uri> for what
955 the result looks like. We've reported our bug! Now let's see how it's dealt
956 with.
957 </p>
959 </body>
960 </section>
961 <section>
962 <title>Zero-day bump requests</title>
963 <body>
965 <p>
966 So far, we've shown what to do when filing a bug. Now let's take a look at what
967 <e>not</e> to do.
968 </p>
970 <p>
971 Suppose that you've eagerly been following an upstream project's schedule, and
972 when you check their homepage, guess what? They just released a new version a
973 few minutes ago! Most users would immediately rush over to Gentoo's bugzilla to
974 report the new version is available; please bump the existing version and add
975 it to Portage, etc. However, this is exactly what you should <b>not</b> do.
976 These kinds of requests are called zero-day (or 0-day) bump requests, as they're
977 made the same day that a new version is released.
978 </p>
980 <impo>
981 <b>Please wait <e>at least</e> 48 hours before reporting a new release on our
982 bugzilla.</b> Also, you <e>must</e> check bugzilla before posting your request
983 to make sure that someone else hasn't already reported it, or that the Gentoo
984 maintainers haven't already dealt with the new version.
985 </impo>
987 <p>
988 Why should you wait? First, it's quite rude to demand that Gentoo developers
989 drop everything they're doing just to add a new release that came out 15 minutes
990 ago. Your zero-day bump request could be marked as INVALID or LATER, as
991 developers have plenty of pressing issues to keep them busy. Second, developers
992 are usually aware of pending new releases well in advance of users, as they must
993 follow upstream quite closely. They already know a new version is on its way.
994 In many cases, they will have already opened a bug, or might even already added
995 it in Portage as a masked package.
996 </p>
998 <p>
999 Be smart when testing and requesting new versions of packages. Search bugzilla
1000 before posting your bump request -- is there already a bug open? Have you synced
1001 lately; is it already in Portage? Has it actually been released by upstream?
1002 Basic common sense will go a long way, and will endear you to developers that
1003 already have a lot to do. If it's been several days since release and you're
1004 sure that there are no open requests for it (and that it's not in Portage), then
1005 you can open up a new bug. Be sure to mention that it compiles and runs well on
1006 your arch. Any other helpful information you provide is most welcome.
1007 </p>
1009 <p>
1010 Want to see the newest version of your favorite package in Portage? File smart
1011 bugs.
1012 </p>
1014 </body>
1015 </section>
1016 </chapter>
1018 <chapter>
1019 <title>Working With Your Bug</title>
1020 <section>
1021 <body>
1023 <p>
1024 Looking at the bug, we see the information we provided earlier. You will notice
1025 that the bug has been assigned to bug-wranglers@gentoo.org. This is the default
1026 location for Application component bugs.
1027 </p>
1029 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-basic.png" caption="New Bug Basic Information"/>
1031 <p>
1032 The details we entered about the bug are available as well.
1033 </p>
1035 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-details.png" caption="New Bug Details"/>
1037 <p>
1038 However, bug-wranglers (usually) won't fix our bugs, so we'll reassign it to
1039 someone that can (you can let bug-wranglers re-assign it for you as well). For
1040 this we use the package's metadata.xml. You can normally find them in
1041 <path>/usr/portage/category/package/metadata.xml</path>. Here's one I've made up
1042 for foobar2.
1043 </p>
1045 <note>
1046 You have to be the reporter of the bug or a member of certain Gentoo Bugzilla
1047 groups (like Gentoo Developers) to be able to reassign bugs.
1048 </note>
1050 <pre caption="metadata.xml">
1051 &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt;
1052 &lt;!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd"&gt;
1053 &lt;pkgmetadata&gt;
1054 &lt;herd&gt;chriswhite&lt;/herd&gt;
1055 &lt;maintainer&gt;
1056 &lt;email&gt;chriswhite@gentoo.org&lt;/email&gt;
1057 &lt;name&gt;Chris White&lt;/name&gt;
1058 &lt;/maintainer&gt;
1059 &lt;longdescription lang="en"&gt;
1060 Foobar2 is a package that uses a configuration file to display a word.
1061 &lt;/longdescription&gt;
1062 &lt;/pkgmetadata&gt;
1063 </pre>
1065 <p>
1066 Notice the maintainer section. This lists the maintainer of the package, which
1067 in this case is myself, Chris White. The email listed is chriswhite@gentoo.org.
1068 We will use this to re-assign the bug to the proper person. To do this, click
1069 the bubble next to Reassign bug to, then fill in the email.
1070 </p>
1072 <note>
1073 A bug for a package without a metadata.xml file should be re-assigned to
1074 maintainer-needed@gentoo.org and a package that needs a Gentoo Developer to
1075 maintain should be assigned to maintainer-wanted@gentoo.org.
1076 </note>
1078 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-reassign.png" caption="Bug Reassignment"/>
1080 <p>
1081 Then hit the Commit button for the changes to take place. The bug has been
1082 reassigned to me. Shortly afterward, you notice (by email usually) that I've
1083 responded to your bug. I've stated that I'd like to see an strace log to figure
1084 out how the program is trying to reach your configuration file. You follow the
1085 previous instructions on using strace and obtain an strace log. Now you need to
1086 attach it to the bug. In order to do this, click on "Create A New Attachment".
1087 </p>
1089 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-attach.png" caption="New Attachment"/>
1091 <p>
1092 Now we have to attach the log. Let's go throught it step wise.
1093 </p>
1095 <ul>
1096 <li>
1097 File - This is the location of the file in your machine. In this example,
1098 the location of <path>strace.log</path>. You can use the "Browse..." button
1099 to select the file, or enter the path directly in the text field.
1100 </li>
1101 <li>
1102 Description - A short one liner, or a few wors describing the attachment.
1103 We'll just enter strace.log here, since that's quite self-explanatory.
1104 </li>
1105 <li>
1106 Content Type - This is the type of the file we're attaching to the bug.
1107 </li>
1108 <li>
1109 Obsoletes - If there were attachements submitted to the bug before the
1110 current one, you have an option of declaring them obsoleted by yours. Since
1111 we have no prior attachments to this bug, we need not bother.
1112 </li>
1113 <li>
1114 Comment - Enter comments that will be visible along with the attachments.
1115 You could elaborate on the attachment here, if needed.
1116 </li>
1117 </ul>
1119 <p>
1120 With respect to Content Type, here are a few more details. You can check the
1121 "patch" checkbox if you're submitting a patch. Otherwise, you could ask
1122 Bugzilla to "auto-detect" the file type (not advisable). The other options are
1123 "select from list", which is most frequently used. Use plain text (text/plain)
1124 for <e>most</e> attachments except binary files like images (which can use
1125 image/gif, image/jpeg or image/png depending on type) or compressed files like
1126 .tar.bz2 which would use application/octet-stream as content type.
1127 </p>
1130 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-new-attach-comp.png" caption="New Attachment Completed"/>
1132 <p>
1133 We submit <path>strace.log</path> and it is reflected on the bug report.
1134 </p>
1136 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-strace.png" caption="Attached strace log"/>
1138 <p>
1139 We've mentioned before that sometimes ebuilds will tell you to attach a file in
1140 the emerge error. An example can be seen below.
1141 </p>
1143 <pre caption="Example File Attachment Request">
1144 configure: error: PNG support requires ZLIB. Use --with-zlib-dir=&lt;DIR&gt;
1146 !!! Please attach the config.log to your bug report:
1147 !!! /var/tmp/portage/php-5.0.3-r1/work/php-5.0.3/config.log
1149 !!! ERROR: dev-php/php-5.0.3-r1 failed.
1150 !!! Function econf, Line 485, Exitcode 0
1151 !!! econf failed
1152 !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
1153 </pre>
1155 <p>
1156 Please attach any file mentioned like this to your bug report.
1157 </p>
1159 <p>
1160 Sometimes a developer might ask you to attach a diff or patch for a file.
1161 Standard diff files can be obtained through:
1162 </p>
1164 <pre caption="Standard Diff Creation">
1165 $ <i>cp file file.old</i>
1166 $ <i>nano file</i>
1167 $ <i>diff -u file.old file</i>
1168 </pre>
1170 <p>
1171 For C/C++ source files, the <b>-p</b> flag is added to show what function calls
1172 the diff applies to:
1173 </p>
1175 <pre caption="Diff-ing C/C++ source">
1176 $ <i>cp file.c file.c.old</i>
1177 $ <i>nano file.c</i>
1178 $ <i>diff -up file.c.old file.c</i>
1179 </pre>
1181 <p>
1182 The documentation team will require the flag combination <b>-Nt</b> as well as
1183 <b>-u</b>. This mainly has to do with tab expansion. You can create such a diff
1184 with:
1185 </p>
1187 <pre caption="Documentation diffs">
1188 $<i> cp file.xml file.xml.old</i>
1189 $<i> nano file.xml</i>
1190 $<i> diff -Nut file.xml.old file.xml</i>
1191 </pre>
1193 <p>
1194 And your diff is created. While we're doing all this, suppose another person
1195 finds your bug by searching through bugzilla and is curious to keep track of
1196 the bug, they may do so by putting their email in the Add CC field of the bug
1197 as shown below. You could also keep track of other bugs by following the same
1198 method.
1199 </p>
1201 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-add-email.png" caption="Adding Email To CC:"/>
1203 <note>
1204 Email addresses must be registered with Gentoo Bugzilla. In order to CC multiple
1205 addresses, simply separate them with commas or spaces.
1206 </note>
1208 <p>
1209 After all this work, the bug can undergo various status markings. This is
1210 usually done by the Gentoo Developers and sometimes by the reporter. The
1211 following are the various possible states a bug may go through during its
1212 lifetime.
1213 </p>
1215 <ul>
1216 <li>
1217 UNCONFIRMED - You're generally not going to see this too often. This means
1218 that a bug reporter has opened a bug using the advanced method and is
1219 uncertain his or her bug is an actual bug.
1220 </li>
1221 <li>NEW - Bugs that are first opened are considered new.</li>
1222 <li>
1223 ASSIGNED - When the person you've assigned the bug too validates your bug,
1224 it will often receive ASSIGNED status while they figure out the issue.
1225 This lets you know that they've accepted your bug as a real bug.
1226 </li>
1227 <li>
1228 REOPENED - Someone has resolved a bug and you think the solution is not
1229 feasible or the problem still persists. At this point, you may re-open the
1230 bug. Please <b>do not abuse this</b>. If a developer closes the bug a
1231 second or third time, chances are that your bug is closed.
1232 </li>
1233 <li>
1234 RESOLVED - A firm decision has been taken on the bug. Usually goes onto
1235 FIXED to indicate the bug is solved and the matter closed although various
1236 other resolutions are possible. We'll look into those a little later.
1237 </li>
1238 <li>
1239 VERIFIED - The steps take to work the bug are correct. This is usually a QA
1240 thing.
1241 </li>
1242 <li>
1243 CLOSED - Basically means RIP for the bug and it's buried under the never
1244 ending flow of new bugs.
1245 </li>
1246 </ul>
1248 <p>
1249 Now shortly afterward, we find the error in the strace log and fix the bug and
1250 mark it as RESOLVED FIXED and mention that there was a change in the location
1251 of configuration files, and that I will update the ebuild with a warning about
1252 it. The bug now becomes resolved, and you are shown the following.
1253 </p>
1255 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-reso.png" caption="Resolved Bug"/>
1257 <p>
1258 A little below, you'll see the following:
1259 </p>
1261 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-options.png" caption="Bug Options"/>
1263 <p>
1264 This gives you the option of Reopening the bug if you wish to (i.e. the
1265 developer thinks it's resolved but it's really not to your standards). Now our
1266 bug is fixed! However, different resolutions can occur. Here's a small list:
1267 </p>
1269 <ul>
1270 <li>
1271 FIXED - The bug is fixed, follow the instructions to resolve your issue.
1272 </li>
1273 <li>
1274 INVALID - You did not do something specifically documented, causing the
1275 bug.
1276 </li>
1277 <li>DUPLICATE - You didn't use this guide and reported a duplicate bug.</li>
1278 <li>
1279 WORKSFORME - Developer/person assigned the bug cannot reproduce your error.
1280 </li>
1281 <li>
1282 CANTFIX - Somehow the bug cannot be solved because of certain
1283 circumstances. These circumstances will be noted by the person taking the
1284 bug.
1285 </li>
1286 <li>
1287 WONTFIX - This is usually applied to new ebuilds or feature requests.
1288 Basically the developer does not want to add a certain feature because it
1289 is not needed, a better alternative exists, or it's just plain broken.
1290 Sometimes you may be given a solution to get said issue resolved.
1291 </li>
1292 <li>
1293 UPSTREAM - The bug cannot be fixed by the Gentoo development team, and have
1294 requested you take the problem upstream (the people that actually made the
1295 program) for review. Upstream has a few ways of handling bugs. These
1296 include mailing lists, irc channels, and even bug reporting systems. If
1297 you're not sure how to contact them, ask in the bug and someone will point
1298 you to the right direction.
1299 </li>
1300 </ul>
1302 <p>
1303 Sometimes, before the bug can be resolved, a developer may request that you
1304 test an updated ebulid. In the next chapter we'll take a look at testing
1305 ebuilds.
1306 </p>
1308 </body>
1309 </section>
1310 </chapter>
1312 <chapter>
1313 <title>Testing Ebuilds</title>
1314 <section>
1315 <title>Getting The Files</title>
1316 <body>
1318 <p>
1319 Let's say that you reported a bug for the foobar2 compile fix from earlier. Now
1320 developers might find out what the problem is and might need you to test the
1321 ebuild for them to be sure it works for you as well:
1322 </p>
1324 <figure link="/images/docs/bugzie-ebuild-request.png" caption="Ebuild Test Request"/>
1326 <p>
1327 Some rather confusing vocabulary is used here. First off, let's see what an
1328 overlay is. An overlay is a special directory like <path>/usr/portage</path>,
1329 the difference being that when you <c>emerge sync</c>, files contained within it
1330 will not be deleted. Luckily, a special <path>/usr/local/portage</path>
1331 directory is created for that purpose. Let's go ahead and set our portage
1332 overlay in<path>/etc/make.conf</path>. Open make.conf up in your favorite editor
1333 and add this towards the end.
1334 </p>
1336 <pre caption="Setting Up PORTDIR_OVERLAY">
1337 PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
1338 </pre>
1340 <p>
1341 Now we'll want to create the appropriate directories to put our test ebuild
1342 files in. In this case, we're supposed to put them in sys-apps/foobar2. You'll
1343 notice that the second comment asks for a files directory for the patch. The
1344 files directory holds the digests (md5sums of files for a particular version of
1345 a package) and any other required files that aren't included with the standard
1346 source archive (patches, init.d scripts, etc). This is a subdir in the package
1347 directory called files. Go ahead and create these directories:
1348 </p>
1350 <pre caption="Setting Up The Category And Package Directories">
1351 # <i>mkdir -p /usr/local/portage/sys-apps/foobar2/files</i>
1352 </pre>
1354 <note>
1355 The -p in mkdir creates not only the directory you want but also any missing
1356 parent directories as well (sys-apps and foobar2 in this case).
1357 </note>
1359 <p>
1360 Ok now, we can go ahead and download the files. First, download the ebuild
1361 into <path>/usr/local/portage/sys-apps/foobar2</path>, and then add the patch
1362 to <path>/usr/local/portage/sys-apps/foobar2/files</path>. Now that we have the
1363 files, we can begin working on testing the ebuild.
1364 </p>
1366 </body>
1367 </section>
1368 <section>
1369 <title>Testing The ebuild</title>
1370 <body>
1372 <p>
1373 The process to create an ebuild that can be used by emerge is fairly simple. You
1374 must create a Manifest and a digest file for the ebuild. This can be done with
1375 the ebuild command. Run it as shown.
1376 </p>
1378 <pre caption="Creating the Manifest and digest files">
1379 # <i>ebuild foobar2-1.0.ebuild digest</i>
1380 &gt;&gt;&gt; Generating digest file...
1381 &lt;&lt;&lt; foobar2-1.0.tar.bz2
1382 &gt;&gt;&gt; Generating manifest file...
1383 &lt;&lt;&lt; foobar2-1.0.ebuild
1384 &lt;&lt;&lt; files/digest-foobar2-1.0
1385 &lt;&lt;&lt; files/foobar2-1.0-Makefile.patch
1386 &gt;&gt;&gt; Computed message digests.
1387 </pre>
1389 <p>
1390 Now let's test to see if it works as it should.
1391 </p>
1393 <pre caption="Testing With emerge -pv">
1394 # <i>emerge -pv foobar2</i>
1396 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
1398 Calculating dependencies ...done!
1399 [ebuild N ] sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 0 kB [1]
1401 Total size of downloads: 0 kB
1402 Portage overlays:
1403 [1] /usr/local/portage
1404 </pre>
1406 <p>
1407 It does seem to have worked! You'll notice the [1] next to the [ebuild] line.
1408 That points to <path>/usr/local/portage</path>, which is the overlay we created
1409 earlier. Now we go ahead and emerge the package.
1410 </p>
1412 <pre caption="Emerge Result">
1413 # <i>emerge foobar2</i>
1414 Calculating dependencies ...done!
1415 <comment>(compile info snipped)</comment>
1416 >>> Unpacking foobar2-1.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/foobar2-1.0/work
1417 * Applying foobar2-1.0-Makefile.patch ... [ ok ]
1418 <comment>(compile info snipped)</comment>
1419 >>> Merging sys-apps/foobar2-1.0 to /
1420 >>> chris +sandbox(preinst)
1421 --- /usr/
1422 --- /usr/bin/
1423 >>> /usr/bin/foobar2
1424 </pre>
1426 <p>
1427 In the first section we see that the emerge started off as it should. The second
1428 section shows our patch being applied successfully by the "[ ok ]" status
1429 message to the right. The last section tells us the program compiled ok. The
1430 patch works! Now we can go and let the developer know that their patch works
1431 fine, and that they can commit the fix to portage.
1432 </p>
1434 </body>
1435 </section>
1436 <section>
1437 <title>Conclusion</title>
1438 <body>
1440 <p>
1441 This concludes the howto on working with Bugzilla. I hope you find this useful.
1442 If you have any questions, comments, or ideas regarding this document, please
1443 send them to me at <mail>chriswhite@gentoo.org</mail>. Special thanks go to
1444 moreon for his notes on -g flags and compile errors, the people at #gentoo-bugs
1445 for helping out with bug-wrangling, Griffon26 for his notes on
1446 maintainer-needed, robbat2 for general suggestions and fox2mike for fixing up
1447 the doc and adding stuff as needed.
1448 </p>
1450 </body>
1451 </section>
1452 </chapter>
1453 </guide>

  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.20