1 |
GLEP: 16 |
2 |
Title: Gentoo Menu System |
3 |
Version: $Revision: 1.6 $ |
4 |
Last-Modified: $Date: 2004/11/11 21:30:01 $ |
5 |
Author: Heinrich Wendel <lanius@gentoo.org>, |
6 |
Status: deferred |
7 |
Type: Standards Track |
8 |
Content-Type: text/x-rst |
9 |
Created: 09-Sep-2003 |
10 |
Post-History: 04-Oct-2003, 11-Dec-2003, 13-Dec-2003, 4-May-2004, 11-Nov-2004 |
11 |
|
12 |
Definitions |
13 |
============ |
14 |
|
15 |
*APP* |
16 |
A graphical application that should be listed in the menus. |
17 |
*WM* |
18 |
A program containing a menu manager (i.e. a program that can display a menu, e.g. a windowmanager). |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
Abstract |
23 |
======== |
24 |
|
25 |
This GLEP handles a proposal for the following two goals: |
26 |
|
27 |
* Create a common menu layout, which would be independent of the WM. |
28 |
This point is quite important for those people who use more than one WM. |
29 |
* Provide a common way to add applications to the menus. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
Status |
33 |
====== |
34 |
|
35 |
Timed out (and now subsumed by the gentoo-desktop top-level project) |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
Motivation |
40 |
========== |
41 |
|
42 |
GNOME, KDE, Fluxbox, to name only a few, have all their own ways of handling |
43 |
menus. There have been several requests [1]_ [2]_ [3]_ [4]_ [5]_ [6]_ from |
44 |
users to streamline these menus. Furthermore there are several bug reports |
45 |
about applications not having a menu entry [7]_, but since there is not |
46 |
standard way to create such an entry, they are just sitting around in |
47 |
bugzilla. |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
Rationale |
52 |
========= |
53 |
|
54 |
The idea of a common menu system is not new to the Linux world, every big |
55 |
distribution (Debian, Mandrake, RedHat, Suse) has such a system. The big DE's, |
56 |
KDE and GNOME, with the help of freedesktop.org [8]_, are also trying to |
57 |
implement one standard. That will most likely happen in GNOME 2.6 and KDE 3.2 |
58 |
(Currently they are only implementing different versions of the |
59 |
desktop-entry-spec, but interpreting it in an incompatible way). But there |
60 |
are still many other WM's that currently don't support these specs. So we are |
61 |
trying to base our work on the specifications GNOME and KDE are going to use. |
62 |
(These are no official standards but evolving specifications). This has the |
63 |
following advantages: |
64 |
|
65 |
* follow specified standards |
66 |
* i18n support |
67 |
* provide the necessary flexibility and modularity |
68 |
* integrate with small changes to our ebuildtree. |
69 |
* support for per system and per user menus |
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
Specification |
74 |
============= |
75 |
|
76 |
We are trying to follow these specifications: |
77 |
|
78 |
* Desktop Entry Specification [9]_ |
79 |
* Menu Specification [10]_ |
80 |
* Icon Theme Specification [11]_ |
81 |
|
82 |
There are two libraries that offer an API to these specifications: |
83 |
|
84 |
* PyXDG [12]_ (written in python) |
85 |
* Desktop File Utils [13]_ (written in C) |
86 |
|
87 |
Our goal is to patch the WM's with the help of these libraries to support the |
88 |
specifications. APP's then only have to install a .desktop entry [9]_ and |
89 |
optionally an icon and will be listed in all menus. This installation could |
90 |
easily be done by two portage commands (domenu, doicon). |
91 |
|
92 |
|
93 |
Implementation / Status |
94 |
======================= |
95 |
|
96 |
This GLEP exists for a long time now, still it is not accepted. I will outline |
97 |
the current status: |
98 |
|
99 |
* KDE 3.2 (x86) supports this specification |
100 |
* GNOME 2.6 (~x86) support this specification |
101 |
* domenu[12_] has to be included in portage to be used by the ebuilds to |
102 |
install a desktop entry |
103 |
* Somebody needs to write patches for the other WM's: |
104 |
|
105 |
We should focus on adding support to the following WM's first: |
106 |
|
107 |
* xfce, blackblox / fluxbox / openbox / waimea / kahakai, icewm |
108 |
* fvwm, windowmaker, enlightment, afterstep |
109 |
|
110 |
The following are not so important, but support some kind of applications |
111 |
menu: |
112 |
|
113 |
* aewm / aewm++ / evilwm / windowlab / oroborus, amiwm, ctwm, flwm |
114 |
* golem, larswm, pekwm, plwm, pwm, qvwm, selectwm, treewm, trwm |
115 |
* vtwm, xpde |
116 |
|
117 |
|
118 |
Credits |
119 |
======= |
120 |
|
121 |
Based on suggestions from former discussions on the gentoo bugzilla, |
122 |
mailinglists and forums. |
123 |
|
124 |
|
125 |
|
126 |
References |
127 |
========== |
128 |
|
129 |
.. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5510 |
130 |
.. [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10429 |
131 |
.. [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4884 |
132 |
.. [4] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25797 |
133 |
.. [5] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=66754 |
134 |
.. [6] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=263106#263106 |
135 |
.. [7] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25756 |
136 |
.. [8] http://www.freedesktop.org |
137 |
.. [9] Desktop Entry Specification |
138 |
[http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/desktop-entry-spec/0.9.4/] |
139 |
.. [10] Menu Specification |
140 |
[http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/menu-spec/0.8/] |
141 |
.. [11] Icon Theme Specification |
142 |
[http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/icon-theme-spec/0.7/] |
143 |
.. [12] PyXDG |
144 |
[http://www.freedesktop.org/software/pyxdg] |
145 |
.. [13] Desktop File Utils |
146 |
[http://www.freedesktop.org/software/desktop-file-utils] |
147 |
.. [14] domenu |
148 |
[http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25756] |
149 |
|
150 |
|
151 |
Copyright |
152 |
========= |
153 |
|
154 |
This document has been placed in the public domain. |