en/glep/glep-0039.html

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">

<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
  <meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.4: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
  <title>GLEP 39 -- An "old-school" metastructure proposal with "boot for being a slacker"</title>
  <link rel="stylesheet" href="tools/glep.css" type="text/css" />
</head>
<body bgcolor="white">
<table class="navigation" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"
       width="100%" border="0">
<tr><td class="navicon" width="150" height="35">
<a href="http://www.gentoo.org/" title="Gentoo Linux Home Page">
<img src="http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-new.gif" alt="[Gentoo]"
 border="0" width="150" height="35" /></a></td>
<td class="textlinks" align="left">
[<b><a href="http://www.gentoo.org/">Gentoo Linux Home</a></b>]
[<b><a href="http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep">GLEP Index</a></b>]
[<b><a href="http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.txt">GLEP Source</a></b>]
</td></tr></table>
<table class="rfc2822 docutils field-list" frame="void" rules="none">
<col class="field-name" />
<col class="field-body" />
<tbody valign="top">
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">GLEP:</th><td class="field-body">39</td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Title:</th><td class="field-body">An &quot;old-school&quot; metastructure proposal with &quot;boot for being a slacker&quot;</td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Version:</th><td class="field-body">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Last-Modified:</th><td class="field-body"><a class="reference" href="http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.txt?cvsroot=gentoo">2008/06/05 20:27:30</a></td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Author:</th><td class="field-body">Grant Goodyear &lt;g2boojum&#32;&#97;t&#32;gentoo.org&gt;,
Ciaran McCreesh &lt;ciaranm&#32;&#97;t&#32;gentoo.org&gt;,</td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Status:</th><td class="field-body">Accepted</td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Type:</th><td class="field-body">Informational</td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Content-Type:</th><td class="field-body"><a class="reference" href="glep-0002.html">text/x-rst</a></td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Created:</th><td class="field-body">01-Sep-2005</td>
</tr>
<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Post-History:</th><td class="field-body">01-Sep-2005, 09-Feb-2006, 12-Oct-2007, 19-Jan-2008</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<div class="contents topic">
<p class="topic-title first"><a id="contents" name="contents">Contents</a></p>
<ul class="simple">
<li><a class="reference" href="#status" id="id2" name="id2">Status</a></li>
<li><a class="reference" href="#abstract" id="id3" name="id3">Abstract</a></li>
<li><a class="reference" href="#motivation" id="id4" name="id4">Motivation</a></li>
<li><a class="reference" href="#specification" id="id5" name="id5">Specification</a></li>
<li><a class="reference" href="#rationale" id="id6" name="id6">Rationale</a></li>
<li><a class="reference" href="#copyright" id="id7" name="id7">Copyright</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id2" id="status" name="status">Status</a></h1>
<p>Implemented. GLEP amended on 09 Feb 2006 to add the final bullet point to
list B in <a class="reference" href="#specification">Specification</a>.</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id3" id="abstract" name="abstract">Abstract</a></h1>
<p>GLEP 4 is replaced with a new &quot;metastructure&quot; that retains established
projects (and makes new projects easier to create), but adds a new &quot;Gentoo
Council&quot; to handle global (cross-project) issues.</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id4" id="motivation" name="motivation">Motivation</a></h1>
<p>The Fosdem and subsequent reform proposals shepherded by Koon are thorough,
extremely detailed, and somewhat complicated.  They have a lot of good ideas.
For many who have been with Gentoo a long time, though, there's just something
about them that they don't really like.  More than a few Gentoo devs are
almost entirely uninterested in metastructure as long as it doesn't get in
their way, and because the current proposals impose at least some order on our
unruly devs these proposals are guaranteed to &quot;get in the way&quot; to some degree.
For example, a frequent comment that has been heard is that many Gentoo devs
don't know who his/her manager (or project lead) is, which is a clear
indication that our current system is broken.  The existing proposals solve
the problem by requiring that each dev belong to a project.  Perhaps the part
that is broken, though, is the belief that every dev should have a manager.
The history of Gentoo is such that traditionally big advances have often been
implemented by a single or a small number of dedicated devs (thus our
long-standing tradition that devs have access to the entire tree), and surely
we do not want to make things harder (or less fun) for such people.  So here's
a minimal proposal for those who remembers the &quot;good ol' days&quot; and thinks
things aren't really so different now.</p>
<p>Synopsis of the current system:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>There are 13-15 top-level projects (TLPs).  Top-level projects are
comprised of sub-projects, and the goal was that every Gentoo
project would be a sub-project of one of the TLPs.  Supposedly each
dev therefore belongs to one or more TLPs.</li>
<li>Each TLP has at least a &quot;strategic&quot; manager, and potentially also an
&quot;operational&quot; manager.  Only the strategic managers vote on global
Gentoo issues.</li>
<li>The managers of each TLP were appointed by drobbins, the other
TLP managers, or elected by their project members.  These managers
have no set term.</li>
<li>Within each TLP the managers are responsible for making decisions
about the project, defining clear goals, roadmaps, and timelines
for the project, and solving problems that arise within the TLP
(see GLEP 4 for the specific list).</li>
<li>The strategic TLP managers are also responsible for deciding issues that
affect Gentoo across project lines.  The primary mechanism for
handling global-scope issues is the managers' meetings.</li>
<li>Disciplinary action taken against erring devs is handled by the
&quot;devrel&quot; TLP, unless the dev is a strategic TLP manager.  In that
case disciplinary action must be enacted by the other strategic TLP
managers.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Problems with the existing system:</p>
<ol class="arabic simple">
<li>The assumption that TLPs are complete is either incorrect (there
still is no &quot;server&quot; TLP) or just plain weird (but the lack of a
server TLP is technically okay because all devs who don't have an
obvious TLP belong to the &quot;base&quot; TLP by default).</li>
<li>There is nothing at all to ensure that project leads actually do
represent the devs they supposedly lead or satisfy their
responsibilities.  Indeed, should a TLP manager go AWOL it is not at
all obvious how the situation should be resolved.</li>
<li>Nothing is being decided at global scope right now.  Some TLP strategic
managers rarely attend the managers' meetings, and the managers as a
whole certainly are not providing any sort of global vision for
Gentoo right now.</li>
<li>Even if the strategic TLP managers were making global decisions for
Gentoo, the TLP structure is such that almost all devs fall under
only one or two TLPs.  Thus voting on global issues is hardly
proportional, and thus many devs feel disenfranchised.</li>
<li>Regardless of whether or not it is justified, devrel is loathed by
many in its enforcement role.</li>
</ol>
<p>Here's a couple of additional problems identified by the current
metastructure reform proposals:</p>
<ol class="arabic simple" start="6">
<li>The current system has no mechanism for identifying either projects
or devs that have gone inactive.</li>
<li>Bugs that cut across projects often remain unresolved.</li>
<li>GLEPs often linger in an undetermined state.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id5" id="specification" name="specification">Specification</a></h1>
<ol class="upperalpha">
<li><p class="first">A project is a group of developers working towards a goal (or a set
of goals).</p>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>A project exists if it has a web page at
www.g.o/proj/en/whatever that is maintained.  (&quot;Maintained&quot; means
that the information on the page is factually correct and not
out-of-date.)  If the webpage isn't maintained, it is presumed dead.</li>
<li>It may have one or many leads, and the leads are
selected by the members of the project.  This selection must
occur at least once every 12 months, and may occur at any
time.</li>
<li>It may have zero or more sub-projects.  Sub-projects are
just projects that provide some additional structure, and their
web pages are in the project's space.</li>
<li>Not everything (or everyone) needs a project.</li>
<li>Projects need not be long-term.</li>
<li>Projects may well conflict with other projects.  That's okay.</li>
<li>Any dev may create a new project just by creating a new page
(or, more realistically, directory and page) in
<tt class="docutils literal"><span class="pre">gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en</span></tt> and sending a Request For Comments
(RFC) e-mail to gentoo-dev.  Note that this GLEP does not provide for
a way for the community at large to block a new project, even if the
comments are wholly negative.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Global issues will be decided by an elected Gentoo council.</p>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>There will be a set number of council members.  (For the
first election that number was set to 7 by acclamation.)</li>
<li>Council members will be chosen by a general election of all
devs once per year.</li>
<li>The council must hold an open meeting at least once per month.</li>
<li>Council decisions are by majority vote of those who show up (or
their proxies).</li>
<li>If a council member (or their appointed proxy) fails to show up for
two consecutive meetings, they are marked as a slacker.</li>
<li>If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further
meeting (or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their
position and a new election is held to replace that person. The newly
elected council member gets a 'reduced' term so that the yearly
elections still elect a full group.</li>
<li>Council members who have previously been booted for excessive slacking
may stand for future elections, including the election for their
replacement. They should, however, justify their slackerness, and
should expect to have it pointed out if they don't do so themselves.</li>
<li>The 'slacker' marker is reset when a member is elected.</li>
<li>If any meeting has less than 50% attendance by council members, a new
election for <em>all</em> places must be held within a month. The 'one year'
is then reset from that point.</li>
<li>Disciplinary actions may be appealed to the council.</li>
<li>A proxy must not be an existing council member, and any single person
may not be a proxy for more than one council member at any given
meeting.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id6" id="rationale" name="rationale">Rationale</a></h1>
<p>So, does this proposal solve any of the previously-mentioned problems?</p>
<p>1. There is no longer any requirement that the project structure be
complete.  Some devs work on very specific parts of the tree, while
some work on practically everything; neither should be shoehorned into
an ad-hoc project structure.  Moreover, it should be easy to create new
projects where needed (and remove them when they are not), which this
proposal should enable.</p>
<p>2. By having the members choose their project leads periodically, the
project leads are necessarily at least somewhat responsible (and hopefully
responsive) to the project members.  This proposal has removed the list of
responsibilities that project leads were supposed to satisfy, since hardly
anybody has ever looked at the original list since it was written.  Instead
the practical responsibility of a lead is &quot;whatever the members require&quot;, and
if that isn't satisfied, the members can get a new lead (if they can find
somebody to take the job!).</p>
<p>3. If the council does a lousy job handling global issues (or has no
global vision), vote out the bums.</p>
<p>4. Since everybody gets to vote for the council members, at least in
principle the council members represent all developers, not just a
particular subset.</p>
<p>5. An appeal process should make disciplinary enforcement both less
capricious and more palatable.</p>
<p>6. This proposal doesn't help find inactive devs or projects.  It
really should not be that much of a problem.  We already have a script for
identifying devs who haven't made a CVS commit within a certain period of
time.  As for moribund projects, if the project page isn't maintained, it's
dead, and we should remove it.  That, too, could be automated.  A much bigger
problem is understaffed herds, but more organization is not necessarily a
solution.</p>
<p>7. The metabug project is a great idea.  Let's do that!  Adding a useful
project shouldn't require &quot;metastructure reform&quot;, although with the
current system it does.  With this proposal it wouldn't.</p>
<ol class="arabic simple" start="8">
<li>This proposal has nothing to say about GLEPs.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id7" id="copyright" name="copyright">Copyright</a></h1>
<p>This document has been placed in the public domain.</p>
</div>

</div>
<div class="footer">
<hr class="footer" />
<a class="reference" href="glep-0039.txt">View document source</a>.
Generated on: 2008-06-05 20:28 UTC.
Generated by <a class="reference" href="http://docutils.sourceforge.net/">Docutils</a> from <a class="reference" href="http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html">reStructuredText</a> source.

</div>
</body>
</html>

1	g2boojum	1.1	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
2			<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
3			<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
4	antarus	1.9
5	g2boojum	1.1	<head>
6			<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
7	g2boojum	1.4	<meta name="generator" content="Docutils 0.4: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/" />
8	g2boojum	1.1	<title>GLEP 39 -- An "old-school" metastructure proposal with "boot for being a slacker"</title>
9	antarus	1.7	<link rel="stylesheet" href="tools/glep.css" type="text/css" />
10	g2boojum	1.1	</head>
11			<body bgcolor="white">
12			<table class="navigation" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"
13			width="100%" border="0">
14			<tr><td class="navicon" width="150" height="35">
15			<a href="http://www.gentoo.org/" title="Gentoo Linux Home Page">
16			<img src="http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-new.gif" alt="[Gentoo]"
17			border="0" width="150" height="35" /></a></td>
18			<td class="textlinks" align="left">
19			[<b><a href="http://www.gentoo.org/">Gentoo Linux Home</a></b>]
20	antarus	1.9	[<b><a href="http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep">GLEP Index</a></b>]
21	g2boojum	1.4	[<b><a href="http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.txt">GLEP Source</a></b>]
22	g2boojum	1.1	</td></tr></table>
23			<table class="rfc2822 docutils field-list" frame="void" rules="none">
24			<col class="field-name" />
25			<col class="field-body" />
26			<tbody valign="top">
27			<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">GLEP:</th><td class="field-body">39</td>
28			</tr>
29			<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Title:</th><td class="field-body">An "old-school" metastructure proposal with "boot for being a slacker"</td>
30			</tr>
31	dev-zero	1.11	<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Version:</th><td class="field-body">1.6</td>
32	g2boojum	1.1	</tr>
33	dev-zero	1.11	<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Last-Modified:</th><td class="field-body"><a class="reference" href="http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.txt?cvsroot=gentoo">2008/06/05 20:27:30</a></td>
34	g2boojum	1.1	</tr>
35			<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Author:</th><td class="field-body">Grant Goodyear <g2boojum at gentoo.org>,
36			Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm at gentoo.org>,</td>
37			</tr>
38			<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Status:</th><td class="field-body">Accepted</td>
39			</tr>
40			<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Type:</th><td class="field-body">Informational</td>
41			</tr>
42	g2boojum	1.4	<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Content-Type:</th><td class="field-body"><a class="reference" href="glep-0002.html">text/x-rst</a></td>
43	g2boojum	1.1	</tr>
44			<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Created:</th><td class="field-body">01-Sep-2005</td>
45			</tr>
46	antarus	1.10	<tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Post-History:</th><td class="field-body">01-Sep-2005, 09-Feb-2006, 12-Oct-2007, 19-Jan-2008</td>
47			</tr>
48	g2boojum	1.1	</tbody>
49			</table>
50			<hr />
51	g2boojum	1.4	<div class="contents topic">
52			<p class="topic-title first"><a id="contents" name="contents">Contents</a></p>
53	g2boojum	1.1	<ul class="simple">
54	ciaranm	1.3	<li><a class="reference" href="#status" id="id2" name="id2">Status</a></li>
55			<li><a class="reference" href="#abstract" id="id3" name="id3">Abstract</a></li>
56			<li><a class="reference" href="#motivation" id="id4" name="id4">Motivation</a></li>
57			<li><a class="reference" href="#specification" id="id5" name="id5">Specification</a></li>
58			<li><a class="reference" href="#rationale" id="id6" name="id6">Rationale</a></li>
59			<li><a class="reference" href="#copyright" id="id7" name="id7">Copyright</a></li>
60	g2boojum	1.1	</ul>
61			</div>
62	g2boojum	1.4	<div class="section">
63			<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id2" id="status" name="status">Status</a></h1>
64	ciaranm	1.3	<p>Implemented. GLEP amended on 09 Feb 2006 to add the final bullet point to
65			list B in <a class="reference" href="#specification">Specification</a>.</p>
66			</div>
67	g2boojum	1.4	<div class="section">
68			<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id3" id="abstract" name="abstract">Abstract</a></h1>
69	g2boojum	1.1	<p>GLEP 4 is replaced with a new "metastructure" that retains established
70			projects (and makes new projects easier to create), but adds a new "Gentoo
71			Council" to handle global (cross-project) issues.</p>
72			</div>
73	g2boojum	1.4	<div class="section">
74			<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id4" id="motivation" name="motivation">Motivation</a></h1>
75	g2boojum	1.1	<p>The Fosdem and subsequent reform proposals shepherded by Koon are thorough,
76			extremely detailed, and somewhat complicated. They have a lot of good ideas.
77			For many who have been with Gentoo a long time, though, there's just something
78			about them that they don't really like. More than a few Gentoo devs are
79			almost entirely uninterested in metastructure as long as it doesn't get in
80			their way, and because the current proposals impose at least some order on our
81			unruly devs these proposals are guaranteed to "get in the way" to some degree.
82			For example, a frequent comment that has been heard is that many Gentoo devs
83			don't know who his/her manager (or project lead) is, which is a clear
84			indication that our current system is broken. The existing proposals solve
85			the problem by requiring that each dev belong to a project. Perhaps the part
86			that is broken, though, is the belief that every dev should have a manager.
87			The history of Gentoo is such that traditionally big advances have often been
88			implemented by a single or a small number of dedicated devs (thus our
89			long-standing tradition that devs have access to the entire tree), and surely
90			we do not want to make things harder (or less fun) for such people. So here's
91			a minimal proposal for those who remembers the "good ol' days" and thinks
92			things aren't really so different now.</p>
93			<p>Synopsis of the current system:</p>
94			<blockquote>
95			<ul class="simple">
96			<li>There are 13-15 top-level projects (TLPs). Top-level projects are
97			comprised of sub-projects, and the goal was that every Gentoo
98			project would be a sub-project of one of the TLPs. Supposedly each
99			dev therefore belongs to one or more TLPs.</li>
100			<li>Each TLP has at least a "strategic" manager, and potentially also an
101			"operational" manager. Only the strategic managers vote on global
102			Gentoo issues.</li>
103			<li>The managers of each TLP were appointed by drobbins, the other
104			TLP managers, or elected by their project members. These managers
105			have no set term.</li>
106			<li>Within each TLP the managers are responsible for making decisions
107			about the project, defining clear goals, roadmaps, and timelines
108			for the project, and solving problems that arise within the TLP
109			(see GLEP 4 for the specific list).</li>
110			<li>The strategic TLP managers are also responsible for deciding issues that
111			affect Gentoo across project lines. The primary mechanism for
112			handling global-scope issues is the managers' meetings.</li>
113			<li>Disciplinary action taken against erring devs is handled by the
114			"devrel" TLP, unless the dev is a strategic TLP manager. In that
115			case disciplinary action must be enacted by the other strategic TLP
116			managers.</li>
117			</ul>
118			</blockquote>
119			<p>Problems with the existing system:</p>
120			<ol class="arabic simple">
121			<li>The assumption that TLPs are complete is either incorrect (there
122			still is no "server" TLP) or just plain weird (but the lack of a
123			server TLP is technically okay because all devs who don't have an
124			obvious TLP belong to the "base" TLP by default).</li>
125			<li>There is nothing at all to ensure that project leads actually do
126			represent the devs they supposedly lead or satisfy their
127			responsibilities. Indeed, should a TLP manager go AWOL it is not at
128			all obvious how the situation should be resolved.</li>
129	g2boojum	1.4	<li>Nothing is being decided at global scope right now. Some TLP strategic
130	g2boojum	1.1	managers rarely attend the managers' meetings, and the managers as a
131			whole certainly are not providing any sort of global vision for
132			Gentoo right now.</li>
133			<li>Even if the strategic TLP managers were making global decisions for
134			Gentoo, the TLP structure is such that almost all devs fall under
135			only one or two TLPs. Thus voting on global issues is hardly
136			proportional, and thus many devs feel disenfranchised.</li>
137			<li>Regardless of whether or not it is justified, devrel is loathed by
138			many in its enforcement role.</li>
139			</ol>
140			<p>Here's a couple of additional problems identified by the current
141			metastructure reform proposals:</p>
142			<ol class="arabic simple" start="6">
143			<li>The current system has no mechanism for identifying either projects
144			or devs that have gone inactive.</li>
145			<li>Bugs that cut across projects often remain unresolved.</li>
146			<li>GLEPs often linger in an undetermined state.</li>
147			</ol>
148			</div>
149	g2boojum	1.4	<div class="section">
150			<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id5" id="specification" name="specification">Specification</a></h1>
151	g2boojum	1.1	<ol class="upperalpha">
152			<li><p class="first">A project is a group of developers working towards a goal (or a set
153			of goals).</p>
154			<blockquote>
155			<ul class="simple">
156			<li>A project exists if it has a web page at
157			www.g.o/proj/en/whatever that is maintained. ("Maintained" means
158			that the information on the page is factually correct and not
159			out-of-date.) If the webpage isn't maintained, it is presumed dead.</li>
160			<li>It may have one or many leads, and the leads are
161			selected by the members of the project. This selection must
162			occur at least once every 12 months, and may occur at any
163			time.</li>
164			<li>It may have zero or more sub-projects. Sub-projects are
165			just projects that provide some additional structure, and their
166			web pages are in the project's space.</li>
167			<li>Not everything (or everyone) needs a project.</li>
168			<li>Projects need not be long-term.</li>
169			<li>Projects may well conflict with other projects. That's okay.</li>
170			<li>Any dev may create a new project just by creating a new page
171			(or, more realistically, directory and page) in
172	antarus	1.8	<tt class="docutils literal"><span class="pre">gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en</span></tt> and sending a Request For Comments
173			(RFC) e-mail to gentoo-dev. Note that this GLEP does not provide for
174			a way for the community at large to block a new project, even if the
175			comments are wholly negative.</li>
176	g2boojum	1.1	</ul>
177			</blockquote>
178			</li>
179			<li><p class="first">Global issues will be decided by an elected Gentoo council.</p>
180			<blockquote>
181			<ul class="simple">
182			<li>There will be a set number of council members. (For the
183			first election that number was set to 7 by acclamation.)</li>
184			<li>Council members will be chosen by a general election of all
185			devs once per year.</li>
186			<li>The council must hold an open meeting at least once per month.</li>
187			<li>Council decisions are by majority vote of those who show up (or
188			their proxies).</li>
189			<li>If a council member (or their appointed proxy) fails to show up for
190			two consecutive meetings, they are marked as a slacker.</li>
191			<li>If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further
192			meeting (or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their
193			position and a new election is held to replace that person. The newly
194			elected council member gets a 'reduced' term so that the yearly
195			elections still elect a full group.</li>
196			<li>Council members who have previously been booted for excessive slacking
197			may stand for future elections, including the election for their
198			replacement. They should, however, justify their slackerness, and
199			should expect to have it pointed out if they don't do so themselves.</li>
200			<li>The 'slacker' marker is reset when a member is elected.</li>
201			<li>If any meeting has less than 50% attendance by council members, a new
202			election for <em>all</em> places must be held within a month. The 'one year'
203			is then reset from that point.</li>
204			<li>Disciplinary actions may be appealed to the council.</li>
205	ciaranm	1.3	<li>A proxy must not be an existing council member, and any single person
206			may not be a proxy for more than one council member at any given
207			meeting.</li>
208	g2boojum	1.1	</ul>
209			</blockquote>
210			</li>
211			</ol>
212			</div>
213	g2boojum	1.4	<div class="section">
214			<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id6" id="rationale" name="rationale">Rationale</a></h1>
215	g2boojum	1.1	<p>So, does this proposal solve any of the previously-mentioned problems?</p>
216			<p>1. There is no longer any requirement that the project structure be
217			complete. Some devs work on very specific parts of the tree, while
218			some work on practically everything; neither should be shoehorned into
219			an ad-hoc project structure. Moreover, it should be easy to create new
220			projects where needed (and remove them when they are not), which this
221			proposal should enable.</p>
222			<p>2. By having the members choose their project leads periodically, the
223			project leads are necessarily at least somewhat responsible (and hopefully
224			responsive) to the project members. This proposal has removed the list of
225			responsibilities that project leads were supposed to satisfy, since hardly
226			anybody has ever looked at the original list since it was written. Instead
227			the practical responsibility of a lead is "whatever the members require", and
228			if that isn't satisfied, the members can get a new lead (if they can find
229			somebody to take the job!).</p>
230			<p>3. If the council does a lousy job handling global issues (or has no
231			global vision), vote out the bums.</p>
232			<p>4. Since everybody gets to vote for the council members, at least in
233			principle the council members represent all developers, not just a
234			particular subset.</p>
235			<p>5. An appeal process should make disciplinary enforcement both less
236			capricious and more palatable.</p>
237			<p>6. This proposal doesn't help find inactive devs or projects. It
238			really should not be that much of a problem. We already have a script for
239			identifying devs who haven't made a CVS commit within a certain period of
240			time. As for moribund projects, if the project page isn't maintained, it's
241			dead, and we should remove it. That, too, could be automated. A much bigger
242			problem is understaffed herds, but more organization is not necessarily a
243			solution.</p>
244			<p>7. The metabug project is a great idea. Let's do that! Adding a useful
245			project shouldn't require "metastructure reform", although with the
246			current system it does. With this proposal it wouldn't.</p>
247			<ol class="arabic simple" start="8">
248			<li>This proposal has nothing to say about GLEPs.</li>
249			</ol>
250			</div>
251	g2boojum	1.4	<div class="section">
252			<h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#id7" id="copyright" name="copyright">Copyright</a></h1>
253	g2boojum	1.1	<p>This document has been placed in the public domain.</p>
254			</div>
255
256			</div>
257			<div class="footer">
258	g2boojum	1.2	<hr class="footer" />
259	g2boojum	1.1	<a class="reference" href="glep-0039.txt">View document source</a>.
260	dev-zero	1.11	Generated on: 2008-06-05 20:28 UTC.
261	g2boojum	1.1	Generated by <a class="reference" href="http://docutils.sourceforge.net/">Docutils</a> from <a class="reference" href="http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html">reStructuredText</a> source.
262	g2boojum	1.2
263	g2boojum	1.1	</div>
264			</body>
265			</html>
266