--- xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html 2005/09/09 03:08:36 1.2 +++ xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html 2006/02/09 21:53:54 1.3 @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
Implemented. GLEP amended on 09 Feb 2006 to add the final bullet point to +list B in Specification.+
GLEP 4 is replaced with a new "metastructure" that retains established projects (and makes new projects easier to create), but adds a new "Gentoo Council" to handle global (cross-project) issues.
The Fosdem and subsequent reform proposals shepherded by Koon are thorough, extremely detailed, and somewhat complicated. They have a lot of good ideas. For many who have been with Gentoo a long time, though, there's just something @@ -145,7 +151,7 @@
A project is a group of developers working towards a goal (or a set of goals).@@ -197,13 +203,16 @@ election for all places must be held within a month. The 'one year' is then reset from that point.
So, does this proposal solve any of the previously-mentioned problems?
1. There is no longer any requirement that the project structure be complete. Some devs work on very specific parts of the tree, while @@ -241,7 +250,7 @@