--- xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0058.html 2010/04/07 06:35:40 1.8 +++ xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0058.html 2010/04/07 21:56:59 1.9 @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
The above does not conflict the proposal contained in GLEP33, which +
The above does not conflict the proposal contained in [GLEP33], which restructure eclasses to include subdirectories and Manifest files, as the Manifest rules above still provide indirect verification for all -files after the GLEP33 restructuring if it comes to pass.+files after the [GLEP33] restructuring if it comes to pass.
Additional levels of Manifests are required, such as per-category, and in the eclasses, profiles and metadata directories. This ensures that a change to a singular file causes the smallest possible overall change in @@ -217,10 +217,10 @@
In the following, I've used term 'M2-verify' to note following the hash verification procedures as defined by the Manifest2 format - which compromise checking the file length, and that the hashes match. Which -filetypes may be ignored on missing is discussed in [#GLEP60].+filetypes may be ignored on missing is discussed in [GLEP60].
While [#GLEP60] describes the addition of new filetypes, these are NOT +
While [GLEP60] describes the addition of new filetypes, these are NOT needed for implementation of the MetaManifest proposal. Without the new filetypes, all entries in the MetaManifest would be of type 'MISC'.
|||Future GLEP on Developer Process security.|
|[GLEP33]||Eclass Restructure/Redesign +http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0033.html|
|||Future GLEP on GnuPG Policies and Handling.|
|[GLEP60]||Manifest2 filetypes +http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html|
|[GLEPxx2]||Future GLEP on Developer Process security.|
|[GLEPxx3]||Future GLEP on GnuPG Policies and Handling.|
Copyright (c) 2006-2010 by Robin Hugh Johnson. This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0.-
vim: tw=72 ts=2 expandtab:+