summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>2019-05-21 00:44:05 +0200
committerThomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>2019-05-21 00:44:05 +0200
commit329d29a2fa7ccb29827fb3f377c8d2362426e3d5 (patch)
treeb33bed9419b345824f02cc9efc980c1d080111f8
parentadd summary for 2019-04-14 meeting (diff)
downloadcouncil-329d29a2fa7ccb29827fb3f377c8d2362426e3d5.tar.gz
council-329d29a2fa7ccb29827fb3f377c8d2362426e3d5.tar.bz2
council-329d29a2fa7ccb29827fb3f377c8d2362426e3d5.zip
council/meeting-logs: add 20190512 logs summary
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>
-rw-r--r--meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt122
-rw-r--r--meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt.asc14
2 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt b/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6e854e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+The Gentoo Council Meeting was held on Sunday 2019-05-12 at 21:00 UTC
+in the #gentoo-council channel on Freenode.
+
+
+1. Roll call
+============
+Present: dilfridge, k_f, leio, slyfox, ulm, Whissi, williamh
+Absent: (none)
+
+
+2. GLEP 63 change request
+=========================
+Motion: Accept GLEP 63 change request like shown in [Link 1]? Yes/No.
+
+1 yes, 4 no, 2 abstained -- motion did not pass
+
+
+3. GLEP 48 approval requested
+=============================
+Motion:
+
+ a. Accept GLEP 48 change request like shown in [Link 2]? Yes/No.
+
+3 yes, 3 no, 1 abstained -- motion did not pass
+
+ b. Accept GLEP 48 change request like shown in [Link 2] but with 15d
+ instead of 30d max ban time? Yes/No.
+
+2 yes, 3 no, 2 abstained -- motion did not pass
+
+ c. Accept GLEP 48 change request like shown in [Link 2] but with 14d
+ instead of 30d max ban time? Yes/No.
+
+3 yes, 2 no, 2 abstained -- motion passed
+
+
+4. Registration request for EFI system partition subdirectory namespace
+=======================================================================
+Informal topic only:
+
+ antarus already reached out to EFI system partition subdirectory
+ namespace registry; Registration is currently pending.
+
+
+5. 17.1 profile stabilization
+=============================
+Motion: Mark 17.1 profiles stable like requested in [Link 3] but with
+ additional (or old, updated) news item? Yes/No.
+
+7 yes, 0 no, 0 abstained -- motion passed unanimously
+
+
+6. Open bugs with council involvement
+=====================================
+The bugs covered by other agenda items were omitted from this point.
+
+a. #542498 "Retire: NP Hardass (np-hardass)"
+
+ Gentoo developer "NP-Hardass" appealed to council to stop the retirement
+ process initiated by undertaker project against him.
+
+ Motion: Undertaker should stop retirement of NP-Hardass [Bug 542498] as
+ long as NP-Hardass shows *any* activity like former staffer or
+ dev in Gentoo. Yes/No
+
+ 7 yes, 0 no, 0 abstained -- motion passed unanimously
+
+ Notes:
+
+ During discussion it became clear that Gentoo project doesn't have any
+ official policy how to deal with inactive developers which forces
+ projects like recruiters and undertaker to find their own workflow which
+ isn't legitimated by the community and can lead to problems like shown
+ in NP-Hardass' case.
+
+ The council will ask projects and community to come up with proposals
+ to fix this.
+
+ Closing statement: All council members agree that we don't want to blame
+ projects like undertaker for the lack of any official, by community
+ legitimated policy on this sensitive topic, but we still want to express
+ our concerns that it was even necessary for NP-Hardass to reach out to
+ council. We really hope that the community will close that gap.
+
+b. #684170 "Copyright policy: should we require working (delivering)
+ e-mail addresses?"
+
+ All council members agreed that it is common sense that GLEP 76 will
+ require a valid email address. However, we are not going to implement
+ or require verification.
+
+c. #676248 "non-free licenses are accepted without user prompt"
+
+ During the meeting council agreed to flip ACCEPT_LICENSE in
+ week 20/2019.
+
+d. #679250 "GLEP 79: Gentoo OpenPGP Authority Keys"
+
+ Motion: Mark GLEP 79 final. Yes/No
+
+ 7 yes, 0 no, 0 abstained -- motion passed unanimously
+
+7. Open floor
+=============
+a. During meeting, dilfridge banned veremitz from #gentoo-council channel.
+ Right after the ban (21:39), ulm already noticed that dilfridge violated
+ a council agreement from a previous meeting [Link 4] that only the chair
+ should ban.
+ WilliamH expressed concern about the violation but accepted
+ dilfridge's honest apology.
+
+b. gokturk expressed concern about undertaker project's policy change he
+ mentioned during discussion of 6a.
+
+
+References
+==========
+Bug 542498: https://bugs.gentoo.org/542498
+Link 1: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/d05070a200e4f5858642d308d9b3e39f
+Link 2: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/a9d6dc3cf28345a2e96c2cfd164226f2
+Link 3: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/d0358901301850b6e41f0ae9d26cef36
+Link 4: https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt.asc b/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt.asc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..014283b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v2
+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+=ECTO
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----